The supreme court is the same as kind of dispute referee regulation about closing 34

1. debtor and its correlation company make over the behavior of belongings to fasten ill will to collude with those who harm loan interest with apparently unreasonable low, the contract that both sides signs is invalid, the property that acquires accordingly should return reductive property holder; 2, laborer enjoys cancel right to showing the inductrial injury that breaks fairness to compensate for an agreement; 3, for domesticity consumption needs to buy a car to produce con issue, consumer can be depended on " rights and interests of consumer of People's Republic of China protects a law " seek redress loss... (the law is believed)

The supreme court is the same as kind of dispute referee regulation about closing 34

未经允许不得转载:News » The supreme court is the same as kind of dispute referee regulation about closing 34