Some estate limited company signs something estate company and development business " early days property serves a contract " , by this property company village of the case that it is experience provides service of early days property. Huang Mou is experience case village the owner of some room, signed with property company on August 22, 2013 " management of early days property serves an agreement " , the agreement offers property to serve for the village by this property company. Huang Mou thinks property company did not fulfill gate sentry to serve, did not execute 24 one hour value to defend a service, communal without safeguard environment is wholesome, without the maintenance that fulfills public facilities service and village exist to the property such as building of violate the rules and regulations serves quality flaw problem and reject pay to served cost to the property June 2016 in December 2014. Classics property company is reasonable urge close, huang Mou still not pay. The property that property company appeals to to to forensic pursue and wipe out Huang Mou owes pay then serves cost.
The standard that serves about property ought to hold to the principle of qualitative price conform to, namely the standard photograph that the standard of the service that property service company provides should collect fees with the service suits, although from Huang Mou offerred evidence reflects the management of property company,the service exists to be in insufficiently really, but the property service that its fail to prove property company is offerred adequately causes village order disorder under congener occupation standard significantly, what also did not provide service case to property company is durative give proof, reason Huang Mou because of service quality refus hands in property to expend, manage occupies inadequacy, the court does not grant to support. This court adjudicates reason Huang Mou should pay the property that owes pay administration fee to property company.
" serve dispute case about trying property specific application law the explanation of a certain number of problems " the 6th regulation: "Confusion classics face urges capture, owner is handed in absolutely without warrant refus or urging property still was not handed in to expend inside the reasonable time that tell, property serves an enterprise to request owner to pay property fee, people court should grant to support. Property serves an enterprise to had provided a service according to contract agreement and relevant provision, owner serves those who be contradictory reason with was not enjoyed or need not receiving correlate job only, people court does not grant to support. " because property service has time durative and cannot metric model wait for a characteristic, onefold owner cannot sheet proves by a paragraph of a piece of photograph, video property serves to be put in quality problem continuously, and need offers sufficient evidence to form complete evidential catenary to try to prove. If more owner will show card is reached,offer evidence to prove property serves an enterprise to serve quality not beautiful, reach extensive sex, durative ability holds water. Property service is existence of certain segment, specific area only common flaw, so the legal argument that makes owner refus harder pay property administration fee.
