One opinion on public affairs offends explanation of women's volleyball CCTV again controversy, can

Recently, the 3rd round argue pulled down Asia Game women's volleyball heavy curtain, chinese women's volleyball beat Korea women's volleyball to obtain 3 Lian Sheng. To such result, fan people won't feel naturally accident, after all below the circumstance that brunt uses up dispatch, chinese women's volleyball still does not have adversary in the Asia. Just after this match passes, however a thing caused the heat of many netizens to discuss, that is the opinion on public affairs about compere Hong Gang. Well-known, hong Gang and Li Ying all the time since the explanation of famous women's volleyball that is CCTV, they also capture the heart of many fan.

However in this match, hong Gang expressed the point of view of extraordinary again, he expresses to the system that accipitral eye challenges should cancel in the match. That is the first bureau in the match, chinese women's volleyball faces the take by storm of adversary, appear and do not have the circumstance of hatchet man outside. But the judgment is sentenced however punish hatchet man outside, for this Ding Xia also appears appreciably is malcontent, juridical theory searchs before she goes up. The Zhu Ting of core main force of Chinese women's volleyball was to pull Ding Xia, and answer through slow motion put, the drop shot of adversary did not come up against Ding Xia really, visible China women's volleyball is this to be in an unfavorable situation really.

Did not introduce accipitral eye as a result of the Asia Game nevertheless, chinese women's volleyball also can eat be unable to speak out about one's grievances only, so Hong Gang's opinion on public affairs also aroused not little controversy. A lot of netizens think accipitral eye is affecting the fair justice of the match, after all in this match more than appear this kind of circumstance, still be Korea team once among them the argue of the 2nd bureau, because block is inside the bound,they are, the judgment is sentenced however punish out of bounds. It is Korea team is in an unfavorable situation this apparently, and below the circumstance that lacks accipitral eye, korea group is same cannot " right " . Really, punished error unavoidable is sentenced in the match, referees also are naked eye will observe, if do not have challenge system really, some keys are sentenced punish appear particularly important.

As to Hong Gang's view, because the challenge gets middle competition,he is probably, affected the match view and admire a gender, because his viewpoint also does not have a problem actually. If introduce accipitral eye, that will naturally promote the just sex of the match, but affected the match secondhand view and admire a gender. So in the heart in you, the accipitral eye technology of the Asia Game introduces, be good after all be still bad?