"Ursine child " a huge sum is hit admire advocate sowed news common occurance, after the parent that cash disappears without trace is informed the truth, the first reaction looks for direct seeding platform to ask to return namely return money reward, but admire the plane that go out, houseboat to must come back even? Today, just gentleman invited Hubei to save the inquisitor assistant Liu Lan of procuratorate of Wuhan city Hong Shan district, listen to her how to say ↓ ↓
Dozen admire advocate what is sowed conduct character?
Hit fictitiously admire article to have real property value actually, make a kind of disciplinary action that admiring also is pair of belongings.
"Ursine child " hit in direct seeding admire advocate sow, it is right actually advocate those who sow is donative, user and advocate sow between established donative contract relationship. Alleged and donative contract is donative person gives his belongings free get donative person, suffer donative person to express to accept donative contract.
"Ursine child " can you hit independently admire?
Can, but the limitation with get certain. " civil code general principles " regulation, the minor of 8 years old of above can be carried out independently only pure reap a profit or the civil law action that the age, as intellective as its photograph gets used to, in addition, should by its legal agent acts as agent or via its legal agent agrees, admit posthumously.
That is to say, "Ursine child " have no right not only the money of parents of punish of do sth without authorization, even if is to use his money to hit admire, also cannot not suit with oneself age, intelligence apparently, otherwise, its effectiveness is to wait for decide.
How can the parent just ask return still make admired money?
Although the parent can is opposite " ursine child " do sth without authorization undertakes a huge sum hits admired behavior after the event to affirm effective, but actually, only by " minor a huge sum hits admired conduct to disable " a word, not particular can successful demand is returned still.
Because, according to " whose view, whose quote " principle, offer objective, enough evidence to confirm even. If the parent cannot quote " ursine child " agree to be hit by oneself without the parent admire, want to assume quote incapable responsibility.
Of course, direct seeding platform did not use up administrative obligation, if fulfil real name to register,make, establish limitation of dozen of reasonable money reward forehead to wait in the light of different age user, also should assume corresponding fault responsibility.
How to avoid " ursine child " wanton dozen admire?
With its after the event asks to return still, avoid to happen as beforehand. The account that parents want to had been in charge of his not only and pay a password, should use up superintendency obligation more, control the time that the child gets online and content, build prison avoid " ursine child " do sth without authorization hits admired firewall. If be put in superintendency neglect one's duty, also want to assume due fault responsibility.
Origin | Just net
