" legal weekly " : Two Laolai refus do not carry out court decision, ruling to be sentenced

Legal weekly dispatch on August 23 morning, court of people of the county that face Li tries front courtyard not to carry out blame of court decision, ruling to undertake adjudging to 2 refus in criminal. Wang Mou of person of 2 the accused, Shao Mou does not carry out forensic become effective to adjudicate because of refus, be sentenced respectively set term of imprisonment 6 months and set term of imprisonment 6 months, probation 1 year.

In December 2013, the court makes civil court decision with respect to desk of dispute of contract of Wang Mou of the accused person and Inc. of commercial bank of the country that face Li, sentence your Wang Mou to repay principal and interest of credit couplet company adds up to RMB 299, 516.3 yuan. After adjudicating become effective, wang Mou nonperformance repays compulsory, credit couplet company applies for to be carried out compulsively, the court carried out advice note and report belongings to make to Wang Mou service on August 11, 2014, wang Mou all was not fulfilled, the court detains decision of 15 days at will be being made to Wang Mou in November accordingly. Duration of detention, wang Mou reimbursement 20 thousand yuan, issue amortize of reimbursement guarantee acceptance, after this Wang Mou did not fulfil reimbursement obligation again. In March 2017, because Wang Mou is suspected of refus carrying out blame of court decision, ruling to be detained by criminal, repay in succession again loan fifty-five thousand seven hundred yuan. Via checking, came on December 20, 2013 2017 first half of the year, county of Lin Li of Wang Mou sole proprietorship such-and-such factory of 9 lis of countryside, paid return ability.

In July 2016 court with respect to Chang De city some casts limited company to sue Fosan limited company of products of some stainless steel (of Shao Mou of person of another case the accused wife collective and as contributive as Liu Mou, Yu Mou hold water, shao some department is in charge of actually managing a person) one case makes business contract dispute civil judgment, adjudicative Fosan some casts city of Chang De of liquidate of limited company of products of some stainless steel limited company payment for goods 432, 776.5 yuan. Shao Mou is mixed in the executive notice that receives a court report property rejects after report belongings makes, after the court adopts the coercive measures such as amerce still refus nonperformance, shao Mou still conceals belongings painstakingly, after July 2016, manage Fosan of limited company of products of some stainless steel income daily by its personal account pass in and out. Come from March 2017 in June 2018, shao Mou remanded early or late some casts constant heart city limited company payment for goods 295 thousand yuan. In case cognizance process, shao Mou carries out a paragraph in the pay inside executive agreement deadline 50 thousand yuan, still owe payment for goods 87, 776.5 yuan.

The guilty fact that states oneself can be offerred according to the facts after be being brought to justice as a result of two the accused, the court makes afore-mentioned court decisions then.