28 days afternoon, in relief court of this case hold office at court is sessional, treasure of the accused peaceful luck expresses to interview content to belong to solid, geng Qu of different idea Lu appeals to beg. This case was not adjudged on the court.
Lu Geng Qu
Baibai He Yu altogethers
Original title: Talk in the special interview " Bai Baihe is off the rails " be sued by Geng Qu of exposure singer Lu from media claim for compensation 1.15 million
New capital signs up for dispatch (reporter Liu Yang) in special interview, singer Lu Geng Qu and agent chat spoke of Bai Baihe's off the rails content, in be being spoken to carry name of small letter public by reporter general. For this, lu Geng Qu in order to report disloyal and violate individual privacy for, article author, from media " Freak " Ning Ruichen of public date author tells a court, the requirement deletes article, video, make an apology publicly and compensate for mental loss expenses to wait for more than yuan 1.15 million. Now (28 days) afternoon, in relief court of this case hold office at court is sessional, treasure of the accused peaceful luck expresses to interview content to belong to solid, geng Qu of different idea Lu appeals to beg. This case was not adjudged on the court.
With agent the talk is put to date of small letter public
Accuser Lu Geng Qu appeals to say, on April 13, 2017 afternoon, ning Ruichen undertook an individual interview to its in some rehearse spot, and transcribe is relevant phonic video. On June 27, 2017, freak of date of small letter public appeared the problem is " what see Tsinghua talent additionally is proud with bias " article. On July 3, 2017, sina small gain " Freak " appeared same article, but thematic instead " Lu Geng Qu: I want reductive a true Gao Xiaosong " . Afore-mentioned two articles authors all are Ning Ruichen.
Lu Geng Qu says, after its see afore-mentioned articles, feel amazed and astonish, think the article is medium about " talk about titbits, bai Baihe is off the rails " paragraphic the interview content that is not its and Ning Ruichen to decide, it is only special illicit is close between its and agent when equipment is being debugged before be being interviewed formally chat, attribute individual private matters one wants to hide, should not report publicly wantonly and diffuse, and paragraphic caption and this content not agree with badly, violate a report objective principle, serious misdirect masses, the ministry one's duty of the article allows as true as its meaning to state presence is very large discrepancy.
Lu Geng Qu thinks, the original intention that its stem from musical communication is accepted interview, but the accused lacks esteem to sufferring the person that visit, the article that compose publishs and video all exceed the content that interviews place to decide, hit " talk about titbits, bai Mou some is off the rails " disloyal label, misdirect masses, cause its society evaluation to reduce, already formed tort. Sue requirement the accused to delete article, video then, make an apology publicly, remove an effect, restore reputation, compensatory spirit damages pays expense of rational thought power 1 million yuan one hundred and fifty-five thousand two hundred yuan.
The ability after the accused says to make public searchs is " hype "
?
What did experience text chapter tell after all? Nowadays, search through the network " Lu Geng Qu: I want reductive a true Gao Xiaosong " , still can find this article. In article crosshead, writing directly " talk about titbits, bai Baihe is off the rails " . New capital signs up for a reporter to see, the text appears with conversational form.
To this, rejoin on front courtyard of two the accused state lawsuit of different idea accuser requests, because of,saying to interview is of accuser invite what form about, interview content to be revealed be practical and realistic, objectively, open content does not involve privacy item, did not cause accuser society evaluation to reduce.
To experience case opinion on public affairs whether be individual privacy front courtyard go up open to question, accuser thinks, lu Geng Qu only the quantity of vermicelli made from bean starch of sina small gain has 100 much, the accused do sth without authorization makes public accuser personal privacy includes impertinent pet phrase, bring about accuser society evaluation to reduce, "Be in private the talking means when chatting and the talking means when be being interviewed formally are completely different, the accused should know what should diffuse to the public. The accused should know what should diffuse to the public..
And the accused thinks, the both sides in covering a process did not agree make public what underground, "Propagandist period just puts forward afterwards, this is the hype of another kind of form in media. " this case was not adjudged on the court.
