According to coverage of Hong Kong media, " the strategy that delay happiness " explode inside not only red, two sides 3 ground are to get more the welcome of the audience. As " Yan Xi strategy " heat is sowed, content of characters in a play is fire more be in a complete mess.
Had divided a few one's early years already the person such as the She Shiman that fire crosses, Nie Yuan, Qin Lan, have the Wu Jin talk of first time conflagration this more. She what had gone out 8 years is depended on " the strategy that delay happiness " in " Wei Ying Luo " one horn, limelight is not had temporarily 2.
However person red dispute is much, the closest period of time, as " Chinese film reports " call-over criticize her " make fun of big shop sign " . Although Wu Jin advert its company group replied a bit late this matter, make an apology. Show oneself regard new personality experience as inadequacy, she what had gone out 8 years however, profess however " new personality " , the netizen expresses not buy it in succession, its look for cannon excuse!
Latest news points to originally two play are about to ask Wu Jin character to act the leading role, the eye sees its have too much negative judge, the group that make already cancelled to be the same as the collaboration of Wu Jin character. Because of " make fun of big shop sign " incident has rumor even or bring about wide report total bureau to be executed under the counter " ban " ! Offend so that she stands between windstorm eye again.
Many netizens express in succession " low-key be an upright person, changeless truth! " " enter sport too deep, just have his moment a few days, return those who think oneself are an emperor really to bestow favor on the wife of a prince. " still the netizen thinks " ban easily, a bit beyond the mark. " more the netizen thinks " fire of with great difficulty group of Wu Jin character thinks originally " upright " come of social status of drive up actor acclaim at least did not think of the go for wool and come home shorn is outsmart oneself · of · of · of · · · "
To this, which kinds of point of view do you support?