Shandong Yantai has pair of husband and wife
They have 35 flatlet 6 cars
Aggregate RMB many yuan 4000 asset
But the car of 400 thousand borrows them to just procrastinating to be not returned
Hid full 10 years...
On August 13 morning
Shandong saves senior people court to combine Shandong to save people procuratorate
Hall of judicatory of province Public Security Department, province issues give public notice
Severe blow refus does not carry out adjudicative ruling crime
Released one case such
Refus does not carry out case of model of adjudicative ruling crime
To hide 400 thousand car is borrowed
Husband and wife two think way
2002, jiang Mou and its wife aperture is such-and-such to Yantai some bank loan is used more than yuan 40 at buying car, after the event, jiang Mou and aperture are such-and-such not as scheduled reimbursement, the bank tells 2 people to court of people of division of Fu of Yantai city Zhi. After the court is tried lawfully, adjudicate Jiang Mou and aperture are such-and-such remand corresponding capital and accrual.
After put on record was carried out 2005, because be not searched,be carried out next person Jiang Mou and aperture are such-and-such falling, its under one's name also can be offerred without belongings carry out, the court is temporarily terminative executive program.
10 years, executive court of application executive support of the people is searching 2 people to fall all the time, search its belongings circumstance. They evaporated with respect to seem world same, whats are checked.
Flash went 10 years, greeted a favourable turn 2016 eventually...
In January 2016, application carries out a person to submit document of triplet Korea notarization to executive court, prove 2 people have house property and car in abroad, application restores to carry out and the requirement is opposite two people be executived with refus hold the blame moves send public security office.
Via finding out, some is in Jiang Mou and Kong Mou 2006 to between 2016, for many times redirection, deal with false census register and identification, came to there was leasehold issue many cases again 2005 2002.
Carry out to escape, came 2006 between 2016, jiang Mou alone or aperture of in collusion with is such-and-such house property 35, car 6, garage 3, car 2, cash hides more than yuan 6.61 million, and free transfers house property 2, property total prices is worth aggregate RMB more than yuan 4000.
Although escaped 10 years, but they do not hide to pass law after all.
In December 2017, court of people of division of Fu of Yantai city Zhi makes public sessional cognizance, think person of two the accused hides redirection, for a long time outer, capable to forensic court decision, ruling to carry out and refus is not carried out, concealment belongings amounts to several ten million, its clue is particularly serious, behavior forms refus not to carry out blame of court decision, ruling.
Some makes Jiang Mou of person of the accused of court decision of first instance of court of people of division of Fu of Yantai city Zhi, Kong Mou refus does not carry out blame of court decision, ruling, all sentence a set term of imprisonment 5 years, punish gold 100 thousand yuan.
Refus does not carry out adjudicative ruling crime
Similar case is true still many
↓ ↓ ↓
House property gives kin to escape carry out this counterjumper to obtain punishment 6 months
On May 19, 2006, accuser Liu is such-and-such dispute of the as such-and-such as the accused Cao contract that rent one case, court of people of Qingdao city Li Cang district (court of Li Cang of the following abbreviation) make civil mediation book, affirm the accused Cao is such-and-such on May 31, 2006 before one-time pay accuser Liu Mou RMB of some cost that rent 63850.85 yuan; Like the accused cannot on May 31, 2006 before one-time pay afore-mentioned fee, additional pay RMB of penalty due to breach of contract 7000 yuan.
After mediating student effect, some did not fulfill Cao Mou the obligation with intercessory affirmatory book, court of Liu such-and-such Xiang Licang applies for to be carried out compulsively.
Li Cang court on June 21, 2006 put on record is carried out, carry out advice note to Cao such-and-such service, instruct its to fulfil legal obligation, but person be executived all the time refus nonperformance. Li Cang court is adopted to its early or late detain, ransack, the measure such as inquiry, did not search Cao Mou some can offer the property that carry out, some also cannot offer Liu Mou to be carried out the person has the clue that can offer executive property.
On November 29, 2006, li Cang court is terminative to this case executive program.
The court is found out after, on August 22, 2008, qingdao some buy course of study limited company to Cao Mou some issued a proof, proof Cao is such-and-such be located in Xi Ludong of Lanzhou of rubber state city at was being bought with 146422 yuan price on December 11, 2002 village of Yuan Lu world 13 buildings one unit 401 house property, cao is such-and-such the house property disease that acquired this house property on November 3, 2008.
On November 14, 2008, cao Mou some and Cao Mou (the cousin with department such-and-such Cao) sign donative contract, free of this house property donative Cao Mou, be in donative to this contract to give to notarization of rubber state city notarial. Hind some property right change the name of owner in a register this building gives Cao Mou Cao Mou. 2010, cao Mou with the RMB this house property more than yuan 200 thousand price sells other.
Because be carried out,the behavior with person such-and-such Cao is suspected of refus carrying out blame of court decision, ruling, li Cang court does not carry out blame of court decision, ruling with be suspected of refus, cao Mou some moves send public security to investigate.
On July 28, 2017, to sue of court of Xiang Licang of procuratorate of people of Qingdao city Li Cang district. Before open a court session, all reimbursement that Cao decides in such-and-such and paid judgment is compulsory.
Classics adjudgement, li Cang court did not carry out blame of court decision, ruling to sentence Cao Mou with refus on November 20, 2017 some set term of imprisonment 6 months, probation one year.
