The word says, in 21 centuries initial stage, japanese the issue that made make all Chinese indignant -- textbook of the education inside homeland of seize some other day, the wrongdoing that and ill will denies the Japanese Invading Army commits in Chinese place (" Nanjing massacre " wait for appalling incident) , this incident one, caused a mighty uproar in Chinese home, the place of the Japanese Invading Army makes the crime too numerous to record below. Privately of Japanese have the impertinence to do sth denies historical fact, should get absolutely the strong condemnation of international society, of course, this incident also has a lot of people to be full of the attitude that reject inside Japan. A lot of " of justice person " also write in succession civil, distort to Japanese government without permission the behavior of schoolbook gives strong condemnation.
Japanese is how to come in the schoolbook that in them privately distorts " description " of the Japanese Invading Army " Nanjing massacre " (the history kind schoolbook) , small make up everybody to cite the introduction with a simple case. 2000 April, of Japanese government " make up write meeting " begin to compile history of new Japanese middle school kind schoolbook, in " revise " after ending, " into the book " sent language department province undertakes corrector. Passed time of a year, 2001 April, language department province is examined " into the book " eligible, use new edition teaching material in the education of middle and primary school. Compilatory Japan " new history textbook " editor in chief to wait with chief editor, all is right " Nanjing massacre " incident is held with " negative " manner. Accordingly, they are intended the authenticity of tortuous history, the evildoing of negative Japanese Invading Army, and will " Nanjing massacre " the peculiar view of incident is written into teaching material of middle and primary school. Revising general teaching material can be " important matter " , so this book (new history teaching material) how to pass desired result? How does language department province of Japan make its examine and verify is passed again?
Of Japan " make up write meeting " in Bai Pi schoolbook (a kind of draft version that did not finalize the design, use) for examine and verify only, the Japanese Invading Army " Nanjing massacre " had such description: "Japanese is maintained, smash the enemy's head, china can surrender, of big Japan empire " holy battle " can win. Capture the capital of China the Republic of China (Nanjing) , stone of interpose of Chinese dynast Jiang is met surrender at discretion, huang Jun is occupational in December Nanjing " (the) of the 274th page of edition of here out rough draft. Still have a paragraph of content, be such descriptions, after the Second World War, draft edition is in " military affairs of far east international tries " paragraphic in the tagging of specially " Nanjing incident " , made annotate specification.
On the trial court of Tokyo, cognizance Japanese is when 1937, the Japanese army razzias the Chinese cruellies kill after Nanjing 20 much people. But, will look according to the historical data at that time, nanjing is in the population amount at that time 200 thousand, and capture in the Japanese army a month after Nanjing, increase to 250 thousand again. In addition, to this incident, doubt also is very much, at this late hour still also is in argumentative condition. Because be in troubled times, also be warlike period, homicide also is relatively normal existence, "Nanjing massacre " should not answer belong to " massacre " the baleful cause sb's death by maltreating him of the type (this article paragraph the) of the 301st page that also appears in white paper.
The content that says above, general meeting gives people painstakingly " go to piece " a kind of idea, that is " Nanjing massacre " cause of formation is generation of the place when trying as a result of Tokyo, it is sedulous and fictional completely (small Japan is met really " play " ) . Japan has to move free, have a word very classical, that is " factual truth has only forever " , the historical account like iron and steel, the population amount before Nanjing is razziaed is in about 400 thousand to 500 thousand between, and of Japan " new history textbook " in give this historical fact painstakingly however " obliterate " , japanese will be in intentionally " Nanjing massacre " those medium sparing of kill, the 20 much Chinese that hide in refugee area say is the Japanese Invading Army razzias when Nanjing " actual " population amount. We also had said preamble, language department of Japan saves the opinion to new text book is: "In white paper on the 301st page, have to " Nanjing incident " description, but on the structure of its content historical fact of insufficient however press close to. " preamble also has said, in schoolbook to denying " Nanjing massacre " content, the corrector that language department saves the opinion is: "Referenced ' Nanjing incident ' number of die in an accident undertake making clear study, of this content elaborate perhaps meeting generation misunderstands different meanings " .
Do not forget national humiliation
The complier of those new teaching material people after the nuclear school that receives province of Japanese language department feedbacks, they just are in place of civil end paragraph to amend merely a few adder if having real significance (content is: Because Japanese ground force is occupational Chinese Nanjing, civilian casualty is more) . Can go up in those specifications later, end works on the west 2 (main " plan person " ) very complacent say: "We (the person that compile) successful, basically be in place is additional that later a few words inside bracket. Although be only " simple " bracket, but in the content in bracket however the meaning is different (although " content " those who say is not so " important " ) . " preamble to " Nanjing massacre " of casualty number state, these people undertook such correction: "When Tokyo tries, the Japanese army is maintained to be when occupational 1937 Nanjing, persecute common people of a lot of innocent China. But the authenticity to this incident, there are a lot of doubtful points however on historical data, still be in argumentative condition up to now. " save the 2nd times in Japanese language department about " new history textbook " in nuclear school opinion, actually, in " shadow " had acquiesced " Nanjing massacre " the baleful misrepresentation history of negative clique is subjective idea.
Engrave history, do not forget national humiliation
To this kind of behavior of Japanese, ministry of Foreign Affairs of People's Republic of China is based on the research of the scholars of Chinese historiography bound at this point, and 2001 put forward formally on May 15 to Japanese government " new history textbook " distort mediumly " Nanjing massacre " incident puts forward to amend a requirement.
The first: Emphasize be in " Nanjing massacre " in research, "There are a lot of doubtful points on provides data, and opinions vary, still be in a controversy up to now in " , its intent is will few number " slant meaning " the definition comment to have catholicity, and intended ground undertakes to the reader revulsive, to " Nanjing massacre " authenticity, and in " court-martial of far east international " on the places conclusion about this incident generates doubt.
The 2nd: The practice of Japanese government is intended and screwy historical fact, will very cruel " Nanjing massacre " incident undertakes " mention lightly " , intended and ill-natured and conceal the Japanese Invading Army to be in razzia after Chinese Nanjing, the innocent common people of the Chinese soldier that surrenders to disarm and bare-handed amounts to into the president half-moon large-scale slaughtered historical fact.
But, the modification opinion that province of shameless Japanese language department rejects to accept Chinese government institute to put forward and provide historical data, this kind of behavior of Japanese, approbate without what get international society, this also makes drop again on the figure international of Japanese.
