At present, p2P is leasehold again and again Bao Lei
Investor, loan square how does thought for the time being?
Small today make up everybody to bring two real case
Cannot take now, look for a police rapidly
Chan Mou cleans out the " that borrow treasure to invest ready money to " for years continuously, ready money also is collected in succession during. Later, chan Mou discovers this platform cannot collect ready money. Chan Mou account is waited for receive amount to have 456242.49 yuan. Chan Mou told this platform the court.
He Mou of the accused person is the legal representative of the company that clean out era, its and the accused Huang Mou are spouse concern, accuser cleans out " treasure borrow and the accused He Mou, Huang Mou to hit to " for many times, carry also fizzle out by the accused now some is direct remittance gives prosecutor. He Mou requests: Sentence your the accused to clean out acting company, He Mou, Huang Mou instantly pay borrow or lend money and accrual.
Forensic cognizance thinks, because the accused of this case cleans out acting company, He Mou, Huang Mou to may be suspected of,use a network the criminality that leasehold platform undertakes absorption the public illegally depositing money, reason this case should move send put on record of public security mechanism to investigate. The ruling is as follows: Those who reject accuser odd Wang Mou sue.
Comment on: Be based on the principle with preferential and civil criminal, if the court maintains platform to be suspected of collecting money illegally of crime, will move send public security office. Once discover platform has,collect money illegally so, calling the police immediately just is kingcraft.
Platform appears personally to did not affect dimension right
Information of accuser Shanghai some finance serves limited company to have a website, lender and borrower can reach leasehold intent through this website. The accused Shi Mou reachs loan intent with 125 people through accuser website, 125 people add up to to fund of loan of the accused Shi Mou 400 thousand yuan.
Later, limited company of some jewelry of the accused Liu Mou, Shanghai is passed sign " assure a contract " affirmatory book, assume joint liability to reimbursement obligation of Shi Mou. All lender pays platform through tripartite of accuser pass an imperial examination to Shi Mou loan 400 thousand yuan, but Shi Mou did not remand all the time, accuser is sued then come courtyard.
Final court adjudicates as follows:
The accused Shi Mou should rise at adjudicating the day of become effective originally 10 pay accuser capital and interest of exceed the time limit in a few days;
Of the accused Shi Mou with affirmatory to afore-mentioned court decisions limited company of some jewelry of the accused Liu Mou, Shanghai pay obligation assumes responsibility of implicative pay off, assuming after assuring responsibility, when what authority assumes in its assure the accused of introversion of extent of liability, some chases after countervail.
Fall in circumstance of break a contact of occurrence exceed the time limit to the platform of normal operation, the rights and interests of investor safeguards a way to include to sue dimension authority with his name; creditor's rights move gives platform the company, by investor of platform company liquidate backward borrower is sued chase after countervail.
