Do oneself oppugn oneself? The government purchases enterprise doubt to give new device

The medical apparatus and instruments that company of some invite public bidding acts as agent purchases a project to announce win the bid after the result, attended the supplier A company that bid to raise doubt to company of invite public bidding. A company says in doubt case, it attends this purchases an item should be useless mark, reason is A him company bid the file because among them index of a technology did not answer demand of invite public bidding, its bid should be invalid, but criticize prize committee and did not do invalid processing. A company thinks this project has 3 bidder only in all, oneself bid after disabling, the materiality of the project answers the supplier that invite public bidding asks to be not worth 3, according to " the government purchases a way " thirtieth 6 regulation, this project should abandon bid and purchase afresh.

After company of invite public bidding receives the doubt of A company to case, undertook checkup to oppugning case, examined its to bid file and quote, discover A company quoted price is top, win the bid in what be recommended the rank in candidate is final; The technical index that A company him doubt answers invite public bidding to ask without materiality is the index that allows deviate. The doubt that handles before company of invite public bidding is the problem that oppugns a person to oppugn other vendor, now is to encounter the case that him bidder oppugns him for the first time.

Interior of company of invite public bidding should be like where manage to have different view to such doubt: 1: Ought not to accept. Because not agree with the lawful law provision about doubt, the rights and interests of A company was not damaged, should not start relief program; 2, should be accepted and reply. A company is OK oneself oppugn oneself, if be really,judge mark mistake to should be corrected. Even if judges mark to do not have a mistake, also can reply, dissatisfactory to answer complain again.

So, whether is the doubt of A company accorded with " the government purchases a way " in the regulation of concerned doubt, whether should be accepted?