Often see news now: The company manages not to be pooh-poohed, owe a good deal of debt, be apt to the boss runs road, the boss jumps building, was the boss sentenced... don't you learn to learn plain general well how? Plain general highest peak when the debt that owed a few U.S. dollors, also do not have finally how! Learning bit!
In hundreds of companies that plain general runs, 4 applied for to go bankrupt, dan Chuanpu had not applied for " the individual goes bankrupt " , "The company goes broke " and " the individual goes bankrupt " this is both between have great difference. After the company goes broke, the individual fortune of partner, boss does not suffer find out, but " the individual goes bankrupt " be about on compensate whole body home.
I do not understand the detailed data that plain general goes bankrupt. Understand two roughly: One is investment gambling house, have a bank fund invests together with plain general; As a result investment failure applies for to go bankrupt, fund had a deficit. Another is the property that plain general bought to install much weight to protect, also applied for to go bankrupt finally.
A lot of people criticize plain general irresponsible. Plain general all along is rodomontade: "I am the petty gain that took law, used go bankrupt clause. A lot of people are in so do. I also am not the individual is playing this game, I have group operation. I have group operation..
In the insolvency in eye of ordinary common people, be " of suffer unexpected personal financial losses " , be " miserable " , " lose face " , but to the businessman, going bankrupt is " of protection " , just cry so " go bankrupt protection " ; Going bankrupt so should be to the businessman " lucky " , it is even " advantageous " . as silvan be on fire, a fire prevention brings very quick start, control fire inside certain limits, this is special " of be to one's profit " . You went bankrupt, go up without compensate whole body home, is this returned not " be to one's profit " ? Your supplier is more miserable!
In company method " finite responsibility " , had the effect of fire prevention forest namely. No matter how debenture Wu is giant, won't the personal property of disaster and partner, this is " limited company " original intention. Plain general made full use of namely this kind of system, limit the risk of investment completely inside company limits, when the company manages not good at, application to go bankrupt, what oneself lose is capital gold only, and nondestructive of personal property a hair.
Understand with respect to me, chinese businessman was registered " limited company " , also cannot use " finite responsibility " will protect oneself, basically have 3 reasons:
It is to register capital gold contributive and disloyal, pursue and wipe out wants when the company is liquidated finally contributive. When company method just came out, a lot of companies are swashbuckling, register capital to be done very greatly. There has not been this now necessary. Do not pass or someone should register very high capital gold, "Identify capture to make " ! Actually this also is " thunder " .
2 it is partner, legal person signed an individual to assure on behalf of the debt that is a company, the finite liability system that allows a company loses action. Perhaps be operator is eager to spending money, perhaps be financial orgnaization too strong, but anyhow, regard a company as operator, "Do not sign an individual to assure " should become a company to manage " red line " , " high tension line " . Would rather this the company manages failure, also do not sign " the individual assures " . Come from risk judgement at least say, financial orgnaization is very sensitive to the risk, let you sign " the individual assures " , because your finance affairs, management state is undeserved,be trusted; You were signed " the individual assures " , be equal to pressure on your whole body home, financial orgnaization this ability is at ease; On the contrary, you are miserable. Plain general also has been risked be restricted, signed an individual to assure, but that is conditional: Avoided a lot of liability namely. Dan Chuanpu still objects " the individual assures, indebted " .
3 dispute law is managed, bring about company items of an account not clear cannot liquidate, perhaps have other break the law bring about chase after duty. This need great said. Have certainly abide by the law manage, certain dun eye can be checked, but careful, this is the premise that enjoys finite responsibility.
Did not pass " limited company " the individual that the form manages need not say, obtain impossibly " finite responsibility " protection.
So everybody wants to notice: Be in business to be used " limited company " go doing, especially great deal; Must manage legally, items of an account is clear, do not be afraid of audit accounts. Hold to company liability, "Have how old the head wears much old hat " , do not sign an individual to assure, with " finite responsibility " protect oneself. Such is in business habit, right individual, right the society is advantageous.
A lot of people are talking this paragraph of time " activation self-defence clause " problem, I feel, to vast business operator, activation " finite liability clause " , just be urgent affairs. Plain general very be good at this, everybody is learning bit!
