When was the bottom line of food safety become " eat not the dead " ?

When was the bottom line of food safety become " eat not the dead " ?

Speak of edible blend oil authority is not new, it is use two kinds or the edible oily modulation of two kinds of above is become. In recent years, blend oil matchs with its peculiar nutrition concept, get the favour of increasing consumer. However, the reporter investigates discovery, the alleged edible blend oil with a few various items is mixed actually the impression of consumer is different. Limited company of sea food oily food sells the Fujian Province on the west chief inspector Luoding sends speak bluntly: Although produce,taste be unworthy of the name or the title, but we stand fast conscience bottom line: Most at least should eat not the dead, not be ground channel oil, this is the basiccest. (on September 19 " healthy times " )

On blend oil market, the composition of a lot of blend oil made motion. These blend oil are being deduced " glib " sophisticate style. The blend oil composition that tags in brand wants how to be tagged how to tag. For instance, everybody knows olive oil price is high, good to the body, businessman criterion joined only " the olive oil of 10% " tag for " the olive oil of 85% " . Come so, can attract more consumer to buy, the olive oil that they use is very few, realized a profit however the biggest change.

Tag to the composition of this kind of be unworthy of the name or the title, a few blend oil produce a businessman to object, they think oneself " had had conscience very much " , most at least " can withstand examines " , most at least " it is to eat not of the the dead " . "Eat not the dead " when to become food safety standard?

"Eat not the dead " , not be for consumer actually, however for oneself. Because once " have a person dead " , also mean should bear serious consequence, can assume legal responsibility not only, still can cause business failure. Say so, " eat not the dead " say oneself " have conscience very much " it is abracadabra. "Eat not the dead " the bottom line that is food safety, if food is " can you eat a the dead " very not terrible?

What should pay close attention to more is food " eat not the dead " the real problem of argument backside. A lot of businessmen of at present, it is under gainful trend, already " eat not the dead " regarded as get victory a magic weapon. The provision that wants you only is " eat not the dead " , even if is put in the problem, even if quality is not high, even if quality is inferior, still also can put subsist. Because, the step that superintendency branch takes just fined.

Our meeting discovery puts in such phenomenon socially: After discovering problem food, superintendency branch can release " blacklist " . Arrived especially main festival when, a lot of places, a lot of superintendency branches, can release identical " blacklist " . And in these " blacklist " in, often can see not little " old face " . Some problem food, even 10 appear in for many times " blacklist " in, in this branch " blacklist " in have, in that branch " blacklist " in also have; Be in this area " blacklist " in have, be in that area " blacklist " in also have; During the Spring Festival " blacklist " in have, during the Mid-autumn Festival " blacklist " in also have.

Why can you appear such awkwardness? Actually the truth is simple, branch of this specification market control also " eat not the dead " the standard that served as processing, want problem provision only " did not eat a the dead " , can put one horse so. This ability is the most terrible place.

"Eat not the dead " it is a bottom line, is not " stung by conscience " . "Eat not the dead " the standard that is not safety of the tip of the tongue.

未经允许不得转载:News » When was the bottom line of food safety become " eat not the dead " ?