Mr Li of Beijing goes to see a movie discover a car full already, park the car in the side outside motor-driven driveway then. After seeing the movie, mr Li discovers the car of oneself produced collision with additionally one car, bring about Liu Mou of driver of the other side to disable via rescue death.
Violate the rules and regulations jockeys
See the film just discover he hit a car
As we have learned, mr Li parks the car in cinema byway road to stand by a side that is not motor vehicle path. Parking space buy and blame motor vehicle are kept apart to rise by a greenbelt between the path, apparent violate the rules and regulations.
The movies looks already was a late night, what when returning, Mr Li discovers him car is left rear have be bumped into apparently trace, car ahead manages park 67 meters sedan of a white, hitting double shine, there is scattering vehicle case fragment between two cars, have nick.
Before Mr Li goes up one look, discover the driver inside white car was in on steering wheel.
After calling the police, ambulance doctor and policeman carry driver willow gentleman accident friend car, below willow gentleman half body is not active already at that time play, conversation says a word not clear, blood pressure is elevatory. Classics rescue is invalid, willow gentleman dies at morrow.
Mr Li is sued
The dead's family member claims more than yuan 110
The kinescope when the accident can see, that day 23 when 04 minutes, the car of Mr Li stops inside driveway of the 3rd motor-driven, the car that willow gentleman drives and add of succeed of this car barge against open double flashlight after ahead travel counts rice, stop right.
Classics appraisal, the dead reason of willow gentleman is cerebral hemorrhage.
Policeman issue " road transportation accident proves " show, "Liu Mou dies because of cerebral hemorrhage, whether is its death reason be caused by of this traffic accident to cannot decide, the basic fact of accident of reason happening traffic is not clear... not affirmatory Liu Mou and the accident responsibility of Mr Li. " the family member of willow gentleman tells Mr Li and insurance company to the court, compensation of cost of seek redress medical treatment, funeral expenses, death, spirit damages solatium to wait add up to more than yuan 110.
Sentence compensate 600 thousand
Break the law jockey to be sentenced to carry duty 50%
The court thinks, mr Li violates what motor vehicle park at roadside motor vehicle act, the lash-up response that certainly will issues in special body condition to willow gentleman causes the adverse effect such as block up. Willow gentleman drives car from rear sail will did not ensure safe and barge against also responsible.
Advocate careful judge expresses, the car that violate the rules and regulations jockeys advocate although be not active tort, but the another person that causes because of neglectful error is damaged also need to assume tort responsibility, make afore-mentioned court decisions then.
Violate the cost that stop to assume so do not rise
Transmit
Remind each other
