The United States is in after quiting board of U.N. human rights, the United States is stationed in U.N. ambassador Hei Li high-key allege the leader that the United States remains world rights of man. She is such view self-contradictory? I think this wants to see you stand in which angle will see a problem, this is the problem of a concept opinions differ from each other to human rights, different to the acknowledge of human rights, can reach different idea. E.g. , what somebody thinks to ensure people to the meal eats is basic live the right, ensure human rights namely, tell rights of man namely. Otherwise, existent condition is done not have, why to come human rights but character? Return somebody to emphasize " connate human rights " , the person was born to be gifted all rights that be an upright person. Have nothing to do phyletic, color of skin, sexual distinction, district, appearance beauty is ugly, height, intelligent, deformity. Besides live authority, still free speech counterpoises, election and the right to be elected, free and migratory authority, privacy counterpoises, equality gets education and obtain employment right, free competition counterpoises, , , , , , etc. That is to say, development level of the society is different, the requirement to human rights and standard can differ. Still be in when a country and society lag behind and develop level, undoubted is to live what authority became all other rights of man naturally is essential. A person can live come down, just other rights of man can be told. Progress when the society, economy booms, living conditions is good, standard of living rose, enjoy other rights of man conditionally.
Good, we talk simply now why should the United States quit board of U.N. human rights? The United States quits board of U.N. human rights most prime cause is its oneself thinks U.N. was full of inside board of this human rights " human rights not clear " country, especially a few backward Africa countries. The United States is a capitalist country that develops highly, economy booms relatively, american people enjoys more human rights relative to the people of those backward countries. And the human rights level that the United States enjoys with him country people will compare other country people to enjoy some living at present besides authority " finite " human rights, reach then the rights of man of other country is bad! The United States is done not have " set a body to deal with " the country that still is in primary society to develop level for those goes wanting, this makes the United States counterpoises to council is in a kind of it's difficult to achieve anything without support or suffer in U.N. person naturally " isolated " condition. Only should human rights board is decided by ballot second reading, beautiful national capital is to belong to minority. This makes American psychology very lopsided, it meets such thinking probably: Level of human rights of my United States is so high, want to low national institute is controlled or be squelched by human rights level actually, affection why can? ! Since cannot produce effect,I am combining compatriots authority board, still stay inside to do what? Was inferior to retreating! Do not join board of U.N. human rights, my United States can hold high on the world all the same human rights old standard, gesticulate to the human rights of other country, censure inscrupulously. Do not attend human rights board to you still can avoid membership fee of a few U.N. probably? ! Won't Telangpuhui think so? The day knows!
Altogether, this world has the United States, the earth turns all the same, how is different to do not have American earth to you can turn after all? Better or is what can you turn some worse? This leaves him everybody to make individual conclusion freely.
