Chongqing bus of 10 thousand cities drops river incident develops up to now, can say to exceed the imagination of most person, incident develops up to now, appeared the sound of a lot of reason, they think how to perfect system of public transportation management, think how to perfect legal system.
But, still put in a kind of quite big voice: Come out, let our fling abuses. The sound of fling abuses also from at the beginning fling abuses of lean to one side is a victim together " chauffeuse " , change is " female shrew " .
District Hei Yong is not absent!
To publishing the opinion that the video that come out and government give out, small law wants to say two " claver " : According to the video that the government gives out we can see, the brawl that accompanying both sides (cannot identify brawl content) , female passenger existence beats and scold a clue, fact of strike back of existence of public transportation driver (violate relevant and public transportation regulation, both hands leaves steering wheel) , later, public transportation driver is made turn to a movement, there is any remedying later movement, accompanying a shriek, the bus sailed riverside of the nether world.
Passenger willfully make a trouble cannot be excused really, ought to assume responsibility, driver processing means also is existing apparently undeserved, assuming responsibility also is give no cause for more criticism, tell on criminal law meaning, 2 average per capita are suspected of endangering communal and safe blame with dangerous method.
The image outside the bus
To the information that the government discloses and the evaluation that give out, opinion cent of the netizen is the following kinds:
1, feel female the passenger is wrong and prevenient, public transportation driver is " self-defence " ;
Self-defence and urgent avoid the illegal block that all belongs to regulation of our country criminal law nearly however main content, the distinguish even if is aimed at target with the mainest both is different, self-defence asks to defend the object is " illegal enroach on " , urgent avoid of danger avoid danger object does not have this requirement. Urgent avoid make clear a regulation in article nearly, the person that has specific responsibility cannot applicable a regulation.
So, does public transportation driver form self-defence really? From learn the respect analysis such as manage, legislative purpose, self-defence and urgent avoid belong to illegal block together nearly however main content, the regulation of both is OK on certain level collective and applicable. This kind of explanation cannot persuade another person possibly, undertake the analysis on fact, this case still cannot form self-defence, tell from the foundation, the defensive object of self-defence can be him trespasser only, and defensive action is buy passenger safety apparently in this case at extreme misery; Tell from the clue, illegal trespasser was carried out beat and scold behavior, did not see in video contend for grab steering wheel, even if public transportation driver carries out self-defence, also can be opposite only " beat and scold " behavior has defence, this kind of defense does not need to come true through changing car travel course; Finally, although maintain,be self-defence, do not have responsibility impossibly also, obvious defense exists to be become too in this case.
2, think female passenger ought to bear full responsibility, of bus driver should be is to should stimulate response;
Not OK when bear other is safe
The civil liability of public transportation company really cannot shirk
Your brain is destined you do not suit to bear the weight of on the shoulder other life
This kind of viewpoint is the viewpoint of most netizen, although excusable, biased somewhat nevertheless, small law is analysed, the viewpoint presence that advocates the driver handles responsibility is less, very big reason is, the netizen that holds this kind of point of view by " clavier a person adept in martial arts and given to chivalrous conduct " of gush too miserable.
Small law can not say " intended " , not be dark person
In publishing the evidence that come out, when the driver's responsibility very apparent, regard a bus as the driver above all, the responsibility of public safety is assumed on the shoulder, behoove maintains exercise restraint, next, video shows finally, public transportation driver has turn to a movement, remedy a meaning without a bit after change direction, sheet looks from video evidence, the driver is put in due responsibility to the accident.
But, view driver is not had duty, also be excusable, after all present legal system, right " maintain exercise restraint " the driver is really insufficient and fair.
3, I think name-calling, no matter be chauffeuse or new shrew.
The district that begins to mention besides the article is black, still have a few otherwise
Big Qing Dynasty died! Still want to sit repeatedly!
To this kind of netizen, can make popular feeling repugn evil only. Do not divide the netizen of dung of gush of green red black and write, full mouth to these, small law had not known how to ought to be evaluated, small law cares family of public transportation driver and the safety of relevant investigation mechanism, fame very now, after all, incident just began fling abuses " chauffeuse " , development arrives now, fling abuses " female shrew " , if liability of cognizance driver of mechanism of final public security is bigger, who should they scold then.
Of a person adept in martial arts and given to chivalrous conduct big person, it is for the country civilian, hope " clavier a person adept in martial arts and given to chivalrous conduct " not again be unworthy of this " a person adept in martial arts and given to chivalrous conduct " word.
