The government is at present qualitative endanger communal and safe blame with dangerous method to form, this qualitative it is possible
" criminal law " of the 115th regulation is with danger the method endangers public safety blame, this accusation is in subjective going up can be intended, also can be error. In light of the case that announces at present, I think can be indirect and intended, indirect and intended qualitative suit not quite for blame of traffic cause trouble, because of blame of traffic cause trouble average performance is error, and so much is innocent the passenger also dies because of this, also answer on seriousness qualitative to compromise public safety with dangerous method.
Female passenger and driver make crime respectively, have fault to the happening of final result.
For the individual, female passenger is wrong and prevenient, plant to this not mannered personnel, everybody be able to disgustful. The driver's deed is not good also, for oneself gain and loss, not consider truckload life.
According to the regulation of procedural law of our country criminal: If guilty suspect is in what before reporting a case to the security authorities, die, public security mechanism do not answer put on record; If be in public security or the procuratorate investigates level to die, investigation mechanism should grant cancel case; Examining those who sue level death, should make do not sue a decision; If be in what the court rules level dies, should stop cognizance, or acquittal.
So with respect to suspect of two crime in this incident, although make crime, but public security organs is won't again put on record is investigated, of adjudgement.
The victim can be to the family member of driver and female passenger inside bequest limits advocate civil compensation, public transportation company assumes joint liability, OK also advocate compensation to bus company according to carriage service contract, but do not belong to make strong danger rangeAlthough cannot hold criminal responsibility, but victim family member can advocate civil compensation, a kind of means is the heir to guilty suspect advocates civil compensation inside successive limits, public transportation company assumes joint liability.
Additionally one kind of means is the carriage service contract that forms according to passenger and public transportation company, advocate public transportation company is compensated for.
Two kinds of means can choose advocates.
Additional, this incident is qualitative going up is not traffic accident, and the victim is the personnel inside the car, making strong narrow pass is insurance of liability of a third party, the member that the car mies wife is not maintained for a third party, do not belong to so hand in strong danger to compensate for limits.
The chauffeuse that is bumped into by the driver can advocate traffic accident is compensated for, insurance company is making the loss that she recoups inside strong dangerBe bumped into to the chauffeuse this part, can decide duty, will compensate for by insurance company, also be innocent victim, it is belongings not only, be in this incident center to manage also was to be damaged badly.
The personnel of public to be not being defended safety, should accord penalizes measure, other passenger cannot sit by and watch no matter, what not consider otherwise is his safetyThe report before the 10 thousand states that the net passes:
Deserve the way of study:
