An article says China Daily net " research: Do not have breakfast and eat dinner too late or bring life risk " .
This, too fearsome also!
Although, come a few years, breakfast is by praise highly all the time the mainest meal, do not have breakfast can meet cause a lot of and healthy harm.
In the meantime, also research says to eat dinner too late, also can bring bad influence to metabolization, increase healthy risk.
But, the view that the combination that resembles such weighing that do not have breakfast to eat dinner too late at the same time this can bring life risk or too too sensational.
What is more,the rather that, what include to pass strict design in recent years is clinical contrast the new research with the much evidence better sex such as the experiment shows, "Breakfast is the mainest meal " the view is a kind of myth, do not have breakfast won't bring any bad metabolization influences to the body, won't bring any undesirable and healthy influences consequently; Contrary, still can reduce total energy to absorb, conduce to improvement health and control weight.
As to the healthy effect that dinner takes before sleeping, on the whole current evidence still can't form any authentic conclusion.
That is to say, china Daily net this article title is real too over- " marked " . However the conclusion that the article says to this is a research again, be a what kind of research gives out so absurd conclusion?
Retrieve slightly, believe a source with respect to what can find this article, be external intermediary reports compile.
Western media most " the mainstream " caption is " eat late dinner and having breakfast is killer of a combination (Late Dinner And No Breakfast Is A Killer Combination) " , the caption of China Daily net still calculates this " devoted to origianl work " .
What kind of researchOf reportorial introduction is to was published in on April 17, 2019 " European heart disease prevents a magazine " on a research that comes from Brazil is short dispatch, text content is less than one page paper in all, the purpose of research is to evaluate ST paragraph patient of miocardial infarction of this kind of Gao Wei is in drive up do not have breakfast to eat dinner late to be opposite at the same time during ICU be in hospital prognostic influence.
We know, ST paragraph prognosis of stalk of heart of drive up sex is very bad, the patient of about 10% can be in after leaving hospital the death inside a year, and the most critical period of time is inside a month after leaving hospital.
In by a definite date during research of a year, have 126 ST in all paragraph stalk of heart of drive up sex is accepting a skin coronary artery intervening cure (say normally put bracket to treat) the patient of ICU of occupy coronary artery is brought into to study limits.
Among them, 8 patients need machinery to aerate maintain life, have change of 5 patients occurrence psychosis, these 13 patients are eliminated to be besides final assessment. Accordingly, finally 113 patients are brought into to analyse.
In these patients, leave hospital 6 people always are shared inside a month (5.3 % ) death, 20 people (17.7 % ) the angina after producing heart stalk or block again, namely in all 26 people (23 % ) in the research set experienced inside 30 days undesirable episode after leaving hospital.
Do not have breakfast to be defined to have 3 at least every week the day does not eat any food before lunch; Eat dinner late to be defined to be dinner eats inside every week (specific time is not restricted) .
In 113 patients, have do not have breakfast of behavior occupy 57.5 % , eat dinner late for 51.3 % -- return at this moment can regular food just is quirk.
The much element with a variety of prognostic to 30 days factors that take dinner late inside at the same time through having breakfast to including is analysed, investigator discovery, do not have breakfast to eat late at the same time the closest relationship is had between dinner and undesirable prognosis, it is cholesterol of low density lipoprotein is reduced next (normally LDL lifts ability is critical factor, here, it is more dangerous instead to reduce) , smoking is affected instead should small much.
What make a person be surprised more is, should be the most critical factor originally, image height blood pressure and diabetic, do not have an influence instead to prognosis.
Be summed up simply and analyse this research- Target crowd is not healthy social population, however the stalk of flesh of ST Duan Xin with a kind of very poor prognosis is dead patient; The example number that brings into research is gross and only 113; Patients of these stalk of tall danger heart of observation are accepted during after putting bracket to treat, living in ICU (did not give out the data of length of time of be in hospital) dietary habit is right the inside 30 days prognostic influence after leaving hospital.
Imagine, a person breaks out prognosis originally the acute heart of very wrong kind straightens, occupy ICU, these patient patient's conditions often very danger is serious, 8 people need to use lung ventilator to maintain life enough specification; In the meantime, dash forward plant by this " disaster " since be exceeding,the state of mind that blows people cans be imagined frighten and depressed, among them 5 people appear even mental obstacle (mental disease) the how terrible of enough specification mood.
In this kind of case, this kind of illness, live during ICU, the food of people can the rule? Can be what moment has appetite what moment to take a place only.
More important is, ST paragraph the prognosis that heart of acute of drive up sex straightens, affecting the biggest nature is itself of this kind of disease; Next, the be in hospital after coming on and leave hospital inside a month, a lot of elements, the effect that includes very much random factor habit of food of should far outclass brings " nutrition is changed " affect. For instance, this during inside the index of biochemistry of a few blood of reaction metabolization state, blood pressure and condition of systemic blood circulation, and condition of health of cardiovascular base line (diabetic it is most main influencing factor) , and the mood changes.
Wraparound for, the people food below this kind of case is far from likely the rule, among them the illness should be the biggest to dietary regularity influence, illness danger is the more serious, food the more not the rule, the prognostic nature of these people is poorer. That is to say, food not the rule and the reaction that prognosis is differred should be degree of be in a bad way more, and cannot regard a among them as another reason or critical factor.
-- namely, because the illness is bad,be create food and drink not the rule and prognostic difference, and because eat,the likelihood is not not the rule just is met prognostic difference.
Accordingly, during this research straightens heart of tall critical sex, dietary habit regards the main observation that affects prognosis as the target, itself of this kind of design is very absurd. And, this is one did not contrast merely the observation sex research of the group, example counts only trifling 113, form any conclusion hard originally.
Consequently, this research itself does not have any meanings.
Media should not introduce this kind of absurd research conclusion to the public more.
Least of all should is, media is adopted when report abominable " caption party " gimmick, concealed goes the crucial information during the be in hospital after acute heart straightens, let a person easily arise " it is dangerous to healthy average person does not have breakfast and eat dinner late to be able to have life " misunderstanding.
If you are pure,look " research: Do not have breakfast and eat dinner too late or bring life risk " this one caption, you can the head fills piece " the ST with the poorest prognosis paragraph heart of acute of drive up sex straightens " " after putting bracket to treat " " during living in ICU " , do not have breakfast and eat dinner too late or bring life risk?