The life of juror is experienced and photograph the angle deviation that resembles a head, can produ

If a politician tells you, he does not believe existence climate changes, you can feel his brain has a problem for certain. But think carefully, such doing reasonable? Perhaps say to let a person be not accepted a bit so, but the viewpoint backside with individual other people, put in the reason with logical move probably. After all, the difference on person and person opinion just reflected our setting difference, is not disposition blemish. Cite a case, together in traffic accident case, american supreme court once had overthrown the resolution of jury, reason is the conviction of a paragraph of kinescope that main evidence serves as in the case insufficient. Can see from inside kinescope, a patron wagon pursues 19 years old of girls that an overspeed drives closely, cause traffic accident finally, bring about a teenager cervical and the following break down. The court thinks, regular panel can think the fault is in teenager is not a police, because be a teenager to avoid a police chased ability to lead to horrible disaster finally. But, choose the representing that go out from inside ordinary people when researcher, when undertaking an analysis to video, they discover amazedly, the analytic result difference that these delegates give out is very big, and basically got ideological the influence with culture setting. E.g. , not quite rich, had gotten higher education and the black female with egalitarian support, the meeting is more possible the culprit that regarding the police is this accident; But, conservative to, for the white man man that supports social grade, he shifts responsibility more likely to the teenager. See not hard, our social setting has very big effect to the formation of our viewpoint, so, the diversity of jury member is having crucial effect to adjudicating a result. On this, american judicatory system is done very not quite still at present. Still a bit need to notice, the bias of the jury that a moment ago we mention, cause very much likely. Research shows, if there is a suspect only in kinescope of a paragraph of trial, so the person that sees kinescope thinks the suspect admits his guilt more likely is the result that police extorts a confession forcibly. Accordingly, although camera can provide valuable evidence, but, they also can affect us greatly the view to the accused and court decision. So, we use video evidence in the court when must careful, lest affect the just judgement of jury.