The times with pseudoscience and flush rumor, how should we do popular science?

The radiate of furnace of mobile phone, Wi-Fi, electromagnetism is harmful to human body can cause cancer even, is pregnant woman necessary to wear radiation-proof take?

"The family that may a lot of people stem from all sorts of purposes to reach you to you is advertised wear pregnant woman radiation-proof the necessity that take. But we should say, not was necessary completely. Above all, ionization radiate is only harmful to human body. TV computer it may not be a bad idea, it may not be a bad idea of signal box of mobile phone microwave oven, the radiate in these daily lives dispute ionization radiate, radiate of ionization of and rather than is hurtless to human body

(you need to notice to be not baked by microwave oven only ripe went)

. Again criterion, common ionization radiate has the X ray radiate when installing check, by air the radiate of the headroom universe ray when. But the dose that we contact these radiate is very small, it is negligible not plan... "

(the new book that above content comes from place of physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences to compile " 1 minute of physics " )

In the times with rumor and flush pseudoscience, place of physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences was in April 2016 on date of small letter public open up " scientific question and answer " , " employ a test really " reach " day of the science on the line " wait for popular science column, include science common sense and refute a rumor, the content such as experiment of the study method that the student pays close attention to, thought and sophisticated science and technology, among them, "Scientific question and answer " give priority to the interactive column that starts a group to answer question of tiring-room netizen science, " 1 minute of physics " content results from just about this one column.

The times with pseudoscience and flush rumor, how should we do popular science?

" 1 minute of physics " , place of physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is written, did not read · to explore domestic · Beijing to publish a company jointly in March 2019 edition.

On April 20, place of physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences publishs a brand jointly " did not read " held in building of physical place M " 1 minute of physics " advocate creative idea face is met. Meeting on the meeting, advocate achieve shared " 1 minute of physics " and " scientific question and answer " column backstage story, do popular science to why wanting, how to do it how be chosen quickly is popular science, worth while to how be chosen quickly the problem such as the knowledge of high quality popular science that looks undertook replying.

Wu Baojun of writer of popular science of university of the Chinese Academy of Sciences talks, regard popular science as the person, the group that he thinks China needs popular science most has two kinds: One swarm body is Chinese student, because scientific education of China still is not perfected, need popular science so intervene; Another group is old person group of China, and the pseudoscience that is aimed at an old person is done particularly hard. He thinks, the old person has him read habit and media orientaton, the books with the on-line relevant perhaps content such as public date, the likelihood is right old person cannot be successful, it is instead " scientific times " " 1 million " scientific times " take community " activity, because the old person buys dish to send paper, article of of all kinds popular science is published on newspaper, probably more effective.

Cao Zexian of researcher of place of physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences also thinks, do popular science to average old person not only, engraft to the scientist of scientific group older generation actually new knowledge is accomplished very hard also. He expresses, they do the target more of popular science to be put in youth and youth group, "Let new generation grow below the soak of scientific thinking hard rise, than what this are important. Than what this are important..

In fact, "Scientific question and answer " the person that quiz is given priority to with the high school student, the high school student will not get on the school and parent body solution problem appeals to the platform such as public date, satisfying curiosity while, also can arouse pair of scientific interest and passion. So, how should have popular science to the high school student? Advocate the Cheng Song that starts one of group members is carried, the institute started public order 2014, but the popular science article that science makes progress and reprints in order to introduce gives priority to inchoate popular science, do taking result so not beautiful.

"Scientific question and answer " the column is given priority to with query of student and parent, answer a part as far as possible brief, explain the profound things in a simple way, for instance quanta calculative principle has common explanation, the cat that Xue Dinge says on the net died already living, so what is the meaning of Xue Dinge's cat after all, the scientific terminology with these will complex interlocution narrates union to rise with what make the same score solid, gout, obtained right result.

Suffer to let the popular science of physical domain arrive at more numerous, they also stand in B, tremble undertook popular science tries on the sound platform that gives priority to with young user group. Wu Baojun still talks, because astronomy and domain of preserve one's health have a lot of cannot the thing of test and verify or extremely difficult test and verify, so these two domains are the heavy disaster area of popular science. He thinks simple gruffly bans each platform from media Zhang date cannot take, so he also can invite national observatory and collaboration of nearsightedness frequency platform, make authoritative orgnaization active be garrisoned new content platform will distribute bear the blame with the information that relies on chart.

And Cao Zexian expresses, although nearsightedness frequency can arouse popular interest, but these content too the fragment is changed, it is adverse that this learns knowledge to the system. "Take popular science to should make the interest that arouses you and the good source that gets segment of a few knowledge from which, this is you

(should)

To popular science

(adopt)

manner. Do not want a hope to construct through popular science your academic system, each person wants to have knowledge truly, still want static next hearts will learn systematically. And acquire two administrative levels, the knowledge that is you wants compact, the 2nd your knowledge wants deep. The 2nd your knowledge wants deep..

"Popular science cannot foster an expert, want to do expert solicit comments 8 classics ground goes learning. " Wu Baojun complements.

Author new capital signs up for Nieli of reporter Wu Xin's trainee to make the same score

How does the editor also proofread Di Yongjun

未经允许不得转载:News » The times with pseudoscience and flush rumor, how should we do popular science?