Netizen one:
Allow Beijing University professor to see a movie from his angle. As a professional personage, see the unreasonable point in film, have strong expressive desire, quite normal. We serve as scientific Xiaobai, see a movie to pursue a bright, cannot ask others and we are same. Later period his a few words, not be the viewpoint after seeing a movie first, still include to respond to the to him evaluation on the network, attack, not be objective completely any more, sober " science " film review, had a sentiment, very normal also, you are atttacked by the network you also can have a sentiment. I read a professor " find fault " film review, contrast the film, feel already interesting, go up again knowledge.
Netizen 2:
At the beginning of good year 2 I looked to roam about the earth, touch very much, but the 3D glasses of the cinema is not very good, it is not clear that detail looks. Affect my 5 stars to the film not at all nevertheless reputably, had been revered degree to Wu Jing.
There was the report that baleful difference criticizes later, very furious, disdain the person that those for the secret of hidden difference criticize.
But the different opinion of earth of billow of convection of Beijing University professor, different however. He is well-meant attack roams about the earth. He said truth, said true word. No matter be popular science it may not be a bad idea, still be loiter heat it may not be a bad idea, he says true word from beginning to end. But see these leaving a message that be in atttack Beijing University professor.
We advocate free, and we are destroying freedom. We advocate democratic, we allow no less than others to say true word however. We advocate equal, regard Beijing University professor as however the contrary of our working people. Be us really really those who want?
Netizen 3:
I believe this professor is not loiter heat, because necessity is not big, but his doubt caused us to discuss here, this is enough, discuss can make us easier distinguish science and science fiction, it is beneficial, good, if can be caused relevant the more perfect union that from course of study big Ga perfects science and science fiction in the following work, better!
Perhaps this professor thinks the inherent obstinate view of compatriots is corrected very hard criterion its this kind of dispute is essential also, otherwise, think I am conveyed so, reckon the meeting self-identity that see cannot stimulate his possibly however to continue to think, have necessarily because of what what I say incorrect, so, it is not quite clear to did not discuss the possibility that show.
So, cause thinking and progress impossibly, so, this teachs me or very of the method that approves him, perhaps he has this more intense than Lu Xun patriotic heart, be means differs only, film of euqally the following science fiction is in have science the historical novel with more wonderful reasonable imagination can spread out to come out on the foundation.
Netizen 4:
Art line of business has specialize in, each doing his own job, each its, do good own job.
Above all, this film is not newsreel, also not be science and educational film, however a science fiction that is put in dummy clue piece, itself of science fiction film is put in hole of a few heads is large place, with already a few clues that some acknowledge go to oppugning fiction, itself is unscientific.
Next, this film gets great majority compatriots approbate, already was the fact that does not dispute, why a few people with respect to compatriots of not to be exposed to good, time will pester dummy thing, be inferior to static next hearts come, well knowledge of one's job of research of with great concentration, take out the research gain of influential force, also not place of crooked smooth body learns.
Again, remove 10 thousand conditions for, why to oppugn this film? Home is so much be denounced " divine drama " also did not see you go oppugning, abroad is so much science fiction is great accord with science, don't have unscientific place, how you are oppugned, go critically ah?
Finally. Teach Yo person, want feel no regret at the heart. Do knowledge research, want resist loneliness, withstand temptation. The instant of loiter heat, perhaps you missed nobel prize.
Netizen 5:
This professor is good, of the analysis quite good. " roam about the earth " it is film of a good science fiction, whether does film of good science fiction accord with the core that scientific principle is him, so to film of good science fiction, people likes to think among them what is reasonable it is unreasonable it is inevitable.
For instance interstellar in passing through, entering black hole hind is what circumstance after all, discuss extensively what caused everybody. Of course, this to physicist also be one is confused.
Nevertheless to film of good science fiction, content must accord with foregone scientific principle, it is the other side this bit. To uncharted territory, can develop oneself imagination, have certain creative work.
