Believe a lot of people have the experience that is forced to leave one's post, if employee does not have what mistake between the job, also did not bring a loss to the company, the company allows employee to leave one's post without reason. Even if normal personnel is optimized, also should offer fair compensation according to the regulation. It is a lot of bosses do not think so however only, always think to compensate for, the company was in an unfavorable situation same.
See on altar of on-the-job recently field theory so a card " the company lets leave his post actively, staff does not agree, the leader that lie between a day does not let take company entrance door, was stupefied! " how is this to return a responsibility?
Occupying what this employee says he is in is a big company, there still is name quite actually inside the industry, but because of these a few years the company profits not much, want to let one part employee leave one's post. Of course the boss' plan is very funny also, that passes a leader to persuade namely, make them active leave one's post. And this employee worked 56 years in the company, if the company is repulsive oneself, that should give a few monthly wages more, do not agree with the requirement of the company so.
But this employee is lain between,was stupefied, former company leader does not let him take an entrance door, blocked the entrance guard of this personnel company to stop, and the network of the company also is not connected on, mailbox also closed. And the leader does not contact this employee at all, do not know how to should do?
So, what is the purpose that will we come to analyse a leader not to let take company entrance door?
Above all a bit, employee is entered do not go to a company, also mean cannot play card normally everyday, if exceed 3 days of sentences that do not play card, that company has legitimate reason repulsive employee, after all employee did not ask for leave more than 3 days, can handle according to absent from work only, the company is OK of discharge employee. Next, the leader also is to want to make employee clear, you had not fought a company, also explained the company does not consider fund, but the resolution that yields employee to leave one's post again.
To this kind of circumstance, how should be employee answered?
The author thinks: Employee can commute normally everyday, not certain also have to goes playing card, need company entrance only, took a picture to go as the record everyday. Once company the reason discharge with absent from work you, can take this completely to arbitrate. Still have a bit, if company leader gives you to call later, completely OK recording serves as a record, these detail must get ready.
