In video to load. . .
CCTV network news: On May 13, malic company is in the United States the supreme court about losing a lawsuit in case of applied shop antitrust, share price weighs defeat to even more for a time 5% .
On May 13, judge of classics of American supreme court is voting with 5 in adjudicating than the result of 4 malic company is in to use shop antitrust case about its, lose a lawsuit, it is OK that this means Iphone user at this point the problem continues to malic to lodge a complaint.
User accusation says, malic application shop sells the 30% poundage of collection to be gotten on to consumer body by marry again in the light of application, this is the inequitable act that uses its monopoly dominant position. The apple ever will express in November last year, mention the accuser of this lawsuit developer of be confined to is not an user. Opinion that blocks dominant of made of baked clay Nuo especially in old judge lay mines is medium, overruled this one argument of the apple, the argument that card covers with tiles Nuo represents an apple besides let an apple keep away from to reach similar suit this besides, do not have too great sense.
Legal expert also states what do not agree with malic company is exculpatory.
Courtyard of law of university of American san Francisco teachs Qiaoshen Davis: Feasibility condition is, app developer dare not sue malic company, because of malic company meeting general its are expulsive its use a store, so consumer is the one party that can initiate lawsuit exclusively. So, the true bottom line of this one problem is must somebody initiates lawsuit odd, found out an apple to whether violate antitrust law.
According to forensic ruling, consumer can sue an apple to use position of its market dominant its apply factitious drive up the price of the shop. The court may ask the apple cuts down the application of 30% to sell brokerage. This legal lawsuit that uses a store about the apple already lasted nearly 10 years, the amerce amount that lawsuit may cause is as high as several dollars.
The apple made a statement that day express, malic application shop is forestall far from, it allows him developer to fix a price to use a product, and the great majority application that uses a store is free. Accordingly, the company did not achieve any earnings from these application actually.
Make final ruling may need time several years to court of this one case, malic company shows, they have hope to did not win suit.
