On June 14 message, haidian court net announces an user 3 times to solve Suo Xiaohuang car to all encounter breakdown to sue new progress of case of Ofo company claim for compensation now, weigh those who rejected accuser to already ruled sue.
Say according to Haidian court net, in trying a process, bai Keluo restrains a company (Ofo place belongs to a company) referred an user to register an agreement to the court, among them the 15th shows, those who because this agreement is caused,altogether or any controversy that concern with this agreement, all should refer trade of China International economy arbitral committee, the active and effective arbitral regulation when arbitrating according to application undertakes the arbitration.
According to the user agreement of accuser and Ofo, bilateral controversy should be arbitrated by commerce of China International economy committee undertakes the arbitration, and accuser did not have arbitral agreement to statement of Haidian court net, company of gram of the name of a river in Shaanxi and Henan provinces that do obeisance to a gram is in again arbitral agreement was submitted before open a court session first, reason Haidian court should rule lawfully the prosecution that rejected accuser.
Haidian court net hints, consumer needs to notice whether the court is had in the process that thought fors the time being jurisdictional, once agree,arbitrate when thing both sides hind, people court is not had jurisdictional.
Incident reviewing:
Accuser on April 20, on May 5, on May 6, when using Ofo small Huang Che 3 times, after sweeping a code to open a lock smoothly, discover small Huang Che is put in attaint, obstruction to cross big, block chain to skid etc cannot drive an issue, after discovering a problem, accuser involves a lock instantly, whole process spends time 0 minutes, but every time all by platform collection 1 yuan of fare.
Accuser thinks, ofo small Huang Che is fulfilling process of the contract that rent in, fail to be offerred to its for many times can ride the bike of travel normally, already made essential break a promise, still use car fee to its collection however, disobeyed contract law to concern a provision, reason appeals to to Haidian court, bicycle of requirement company compensation rents charge loss 3 yuan.
