The reporter learns from Hangzhou quadrangle, hangzhou quadrangle was released today " Hangzhou baby-sitter is incendiary case " the 3 accuser such as Lin Shengbin accuse green city property serves group limited company to wait for issue of power of life of 9 the accused bulletin of one case case, the bulletin shows, what Hangzhou quadrangle rejected bureaus of pair of fire control of Hangzhou city public security lawfully is civil sue. It is bulletin full text below.
? On May 21, 2018, lin Shengbin, Zhu Hengren, Xu Mei branch serves look forward to of sea of green city of group limited company, Hangzhou with green city property bureau of fire control of public security of city of industrial limited company, Hangzhou, medium establish 3 bureaus group limited company, Zhejiang is green city east builds a design limited company, Zhejiang, mention to this academy life power issue is civil lawsuit, the requirement is sentenced your expenses of compensation of death of compensation of 9 the accused, funeral expenses, transportation, be expended alive by bring up life aggregate 23557440.8 yuan, belongings loss 41000000 yuan, spirit damages solatium 80000000 yuan, make an apology.
On May 28, this academy imparts risk of the mediation before appealing to, lawsuit to 3 accuser lawfully, sue material to make good omissions wait for item; In the meantime, the put out a fire that carries out in view of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security comes to help behavior is not civil action, suggest 3 accuser recall of bureaus of pair of fire control of Hangzhou city public security civil sue. Via Shi Ming, 3 accuser do not agree to recall. Register the concerned mind that make about executing put on record according to top people court, this academy decision stands along with all the others first case accept.
After put on record, this academy thinks via examining, the put out a fire that legal laws and regulations carries out related basis of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security comes to help behavior is not civil action, behavior does not come to help to produce civil law impact because of this put out a fire between 3 accuser and bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security. Rescuing behavior puts the put out a fire that 3 accuser carry out with bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security have ask its assume civil liability to pay compensation for fault, do not belong to people court to accept the limits of civil suit lawfully. On June 25, classics this academy again Shi Ming, 3 accuser still do not agree to recall this are sued, this academy rules lawfully then reject its to be opposite of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security civil sue.
This academy will continue to hear this case lawfully. (CCTV reporter Li Wenjie)
