On June 22 morning, court of city intermediate people holds a press conference, release to the society " the judgment that court of Huhhot city intermediate people serves contract dispute case about trying property is how-to (try out) " (later development abbreviation " the judgment is how-to " ) . This " the judgment is how-to " in all 18, commonner to be before in case of dispute of cognizance property contract case undertakes combing, unite standard of judge of two class court, avoid to be the same as the proposal is different sentence a problem.
Data chart
According to introducing, in recent years, accelerate ceaselessly as what metropolis city changes a course, people living standard rises ceaselessly, enter a city to be moved into the building to live in succession, the amount of dispute of property service contract that swarms into a court subsequently increase sharply, achieved 4446 2017, 2.65 times was 2014. But existing law, code and the new issue that judicatory explains to in appropriate is answered and already cannot handling property to serve a contract to rule, appear, new case, two class court faces greater adjudgement pressure. Accordingly, the actual cognizance case that court of city intermediate people joins property of whole town court of justice to serve contract dispute, after in-depth survey is analysed and seeking an opinion via several, come on stage finally " the judgment that court of Huhhot city intermediate people serves contract dispute case about trying property is how-to (try out) " .
As we have learned, this " the judgment is how-to " apply since this day, among them after 7 content are, two class courts of our city are in the place when hearing property dispute case involves litigant main body, evidence and car, the authority of greenbelt is belonged to waited for content to undertake making clear.
Among them, it is the principal part that serves a contract to property, make like committee of owner, owner, other property choose and employ persons and property serve an industry, try to make clear further, enlarge owner limits to include to be based on with the conduct of commodity house business between construction unit, already had a building to have a share only legally but the person that has not handle droit to register lawfully; 2 it is the evidential data that ought to submit when sue to property company, grade of aptitude of company of service of the evidence that the written testimony that includes property to serve the contract, property that urge capture to expend, property serves an enterprise to provide corresponding service, property proves to wait, try to make clear further; The 3 service limits that are company of service of the property in serving a contract to property, if safeguard the elevator inside responsibility, village to have to the public facilities such as equipment moving to have inside the village,safeguard obligation, safeguard a village the obligation of public property safety, try to make clear further; 4 it is right property of accept of owner refus break off relations is expended but the case that the court does not grant to support, if property serves an enterprise to serve quality,quality of slight flaw, building, central heating is not heated up, was not enjoyed or need not accept reason of property service, oneself to did not live, not be contract party or contract him blame place autograph, agreement use a person by building tenant borrower or property, try to make clear further; 5 it is the responsibility form that compulsory to breach of contract of property service company place assumes, company of service of the contract responsibility with reparative to property company of service of the contract responsibility that includes early days property to serve administrative level property to serve an industry, property, property is right the safety of public facilities manages responsibility of obligation and its contract, the 3rd person to send kill the property below case to serve an enterprise to disobey security personnel compulsory place agree, try to make clear further; 6 it is OK to owner the requirement is decreased close, return return property to expend case, the service item that property service company offers and quality and the standard difference that the contract agrees are apparent, responsibility of management of service of nonperformance of property service company perhaps fulfills duty to exist do sth without authorization of company of service of serious mistake, property expands collect fees limits, raise rate, repeat those who collect fees, try to make clear further; 7 it is the case with pair of legal and mutual owner, if build division into districts the road inside, greenbelt, other public, common establishment, property serves the car that with the room, road that takes up owner is shared other perhaps place uses at park car, the building reachs his of accessary establishment safeguard capital, elevator, cistern, try to make clear further.
