Last night, today's top headlines carries date of public of its government small letter and head date phonates, express to will be opposite " Baidu is shocking competition " to lodge a complaint. Main around the following at 2 o'clock:
One, first say to be searched in Baidu " today's top headlines " relevant content, search result sort the first come from Baidu banner to issue order of a hunderd schools, the 2nd ability is a head government-owned net. And former article content is " today's top headlines is violated neat change " , still recommend in the App of the information that browse in, head push " mobile phone Baidu " .
2, search " today's top headlines, the ability that you care is a head " when, although Baidu search first place is a head government-owned net, but warn with rubric designation however, "Remind: Because this page serves not stable likelihood to cannot be visited normally " .
It is 36 krypton reporter is in below early on January 30 4:39, search with mobile end " today's top headlines " and " the ability that you care today's top headlines is a head " two keywords, former indication result takes the lead in be a head advertisement, it is a head next violate neat the content of date of a hunderd schools that change, head government-owned net; A keyword after the search, appear really Baidu rubric " cannot visit normally " remind. Additional, app end searchs result and mobile end to agree, PC end searchs a result first times to all be a head government-owned net.
Baidu respect, evening correct lawsuit also made a response, point out Baidu nature is searched result and " of sex of user demand, dependency, effectiveness for a given period of time, user click a series of elements such as behavior relevant " , baidu respect expresses, first call its technical personnel prediction of a person's luck in a given year it is baleful start a rumour badly, take reservation the right that legal action thought fors the time being.
This is the 2nd collision of iformation flow double tycoon, baidu VS head stick to one's argument, do you stand who? Poll beneath the point of view that demonstrates you:
