Small gain of government of court of intermediate people of city of Zhejiang province Hangzhou releases the 3 accuser such as Lin Shengbin to accuse green city property serves group limited company to wait for issue of power of life of 9 the accused now bulletin of one case case, the ruling rejects the 3 accuser such as Lin Shengbin to be opposite of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security civil sue.
Before dawn was controlled at 5 o'clock on June 22, 2017, village of river of money of Zhejiang Hangzhou blue produces arson record, cause 4 people death, arson person for Mo Huanjing of this door baby-sitter. Lin Shengbin is family member of the injured party, his wife mixes 3 year of young child is unfortunate in fire die.
The bulletin says, on May 21, 2018, lin Shengbin, Zhu Hengren, Xu Mei branch serves look forward to of sea of green city of group limited company, Hangzhou with green city property bureau of fire control of public security of city of industrial limited company, Hangzhou, medium establish 3 bureaus group limited company, Zhejiang is green city east builds a design limited company, Zhejiang, mention to this academy life power issue is civil lawsuit, the requirement is sentenced your expenses of compensation of death of compensation of 9 the accused, funeral expenses, transportation, be lived to expend aggregate 23 557 440.8 by bring up life yuan, belongings loss 41 000 000 yuan, spirit damages solatium 80 000 000 yuan, make an apology.
The bulletin points out, on May 28, this academy imparts risk of the mediation before appealing to, lawsuit to 3 accuser lawfully, sue material to make good omissions wait for item; In the meantime, the put out a fire that carries out in view of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security comes to help behavior is not civil action, suggest 3 accuser recall of bureaus of pair of fire control of Hangzhou city public security civil sue. Via Shi Ming, 3 accuser do not agree to recall. Register the concerned mind that make about executing put on record according to top people court, this academy decision stands along with all the others first case accept.
The bulletin still points out, after put on record, this academy thinks via examining, the put out a fire that legal laws and regulations carries out related basis of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security comes to help behavior is not civil action, behavior does not come to help to produce civil law impact because of this put out a fire between 3 accuser and bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security. Rescuing behavior puts the put out a fire that 3 accuser carry out with bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security have ask its assume civil liability to pay compensation for fault, do not belong to people court to accept the limits of civil suit lawfully. On June 25, classics this academy again Shi Ming, 3 accuser still do not agree to recall this are sued, this academy rules lawfully then reject its to be opposite of bureau of fire control of Hangzhou city public security civil sue.
