Discharge capacity is pointed to greatly " false environmental protection " sampling of tesla doub

In report reported new net integratedly on June 26, tesla of business of electric car production (Tesla) sells a site for the product with environmental protection all along, but England considers to discover, although tesla is released when travel carbon dioxide is less, but manufacturing report motor-car and charge the discharge capacity of generation is very breathtaking however, among them year of discharge capacity of Model S be like with photograph of general benzine car almost, think tesla does not have the environmental protection in the imagination.

Discharge capacity is pointed to greatly " false environmental protection " sampling of tesla doubt research is undeserved

Data picture: Tesla MODEL 3. Gu Tianyong of reporter of China News Service is photographed

It is reported, study by standard of British environmental protection test orgnaization Engaged Tracking is undertaken, it is main example with Model S, when its are being produced and charging, computation arises year all carbon dioxide discharge capacity, follow British car year all discharge data to undertake comparative, discovery is both year all carbon dioxide discharge capacity is 1.5 tons together.

Research still compared Model S and BMW I3 of BMW report motor-car, discover latter discharge capacity has 1.3 tons only, relatively Model S is economic 15% .

To this, tesla response expresses, year all discharge data to include numerous minicar, have difference with the norms of Model S, do not answer to be compared together, point out, according to the norms of BMW I3, model 3 just is appropriate research example, sampling of doubt Engaged Tracking is undeserved and choose data.

Tesla emphasizes, if analyse justice, should can reach electric car every carbon dioxide discharge capacity relatively fuel car is fewer.

Welcome to reprint:News » Discharge capacity is pointed to greatly " false environmental protection " sampling of tesla doub
Share: