Nature and biology cosmetic: Consumer is right 13 problems of standard ISO 16128

Nature and biology cosmetic: Consumer is right 13 problems of standard ISO 16128

About natural the 2nd part of the ISO 16128 with organic cosmetic in September the bottom is published. Pay close attention to the main problem of consumer.

Why to found ISO 16128?

ISO 16128 is to coordinate the term that concerns with the biology between world each country and natural ingredient.

Change character, standard purpose is the common language that in international one class limits nature and biology part.

In the decision-making process that publishs ISO 16128, what kind of decision-making process?

Executive ISO standard includes the following measure:

1: Above all, committee of a technology is considering how to this project is developed on the foundation in market demand.

2: Every 28 countries are participated in is by a delegacy discussion text is drafted annual two by technical committee ISO. The one part of this delegacy, be necessary to pay year of fee. Because this is the pay money of thousands of euro, the visit to delegacy is a complex issue for the delegate to BIO cosmetic industry, and the participator that is treaty orgnaization offerred advantage.

3: Delegacy offerred an opinion, made revise and further meeting.

4: When discussion end, delegacy will undertake voting, in order to decide whether it agrees with draft standard. In this phase, cosmetic is abhorrent. However, on the level of French delegacy, this is " hold with " .

5: Finally, delegacy held all countries to poll. If " win " new bid brigadier is announced.

What is standard ISO 16128 after all?

? The definition of the composition of natural or natural ramification.

? The definition of biology composition or biology ramification.

? Nature and / or the computational method of biology composition index.

? Organic or computation is natural the per cent of composition.

Nature and biology cosmetic: Consumer is right 13 problems of standard ISO 16128

Whether did standard ISO 16128 change the requirement of historical label?

Deny.

Label was abided by mix strictly the transparent requirement that pack, be like association of cosmetic, Ecocert, BDIH, soil and ICEA, participator of European biologic history.

ISO touchstone in any event is unalterable the requirement of label. We still assure the natural ingredient of 95% and the biology raw material of 95% .

Does everyone agree the definition of natural material?

Not.

They agree door ECOCERT photograph, discovery discussion is according with the standard of profit of traditional cosmetic industry to undertake forward, damaged the diaphaneity of consumer information.

German delegacy, by BDIH association delegate, blackball is all offerred text.

Accordingly, we refuse will " consensus " the decision-making process of Iso 16128 of one word described as.

Whether was ISO 16128 included " blacklist " composition and process?

Not.

This standard does not prohibit component, it offers definition and calculation only, in order to show some spy a system of fixed quotas for grain production tastes the per cent of medium natural ingredient or biology composition.

Accordingly, the raw material with OK and free will open to question land brings into industrial group in its formula, among them some are suspected to be endocrine interference (phenol alcohol, benzene and phenol - 3, oxygen of armour of Babylonian, chloric acid, chloric ethane, 3 chloric ethane, 3 chloric ethane, second radical base cinnamonic acid... ) .

This, the per cent of the nature that also showed bag mount at the same time or biology composition.

Standard ISO 16128 set natural lowermost percentage, is with ensuring cosmetic considered as nature?

Not

ISO 16128 did not show this, it offers the definition of the naturalization index about specific ingredient and calculation only.

In France, advertisement major management board comes for years already will " natural product " name for " natural product " , its form the natural part of more than 95% .

The specification of Arpp: A kind of cosmetic cannot is by classify " natural " , if end item contains the part of at least 95% (P/p) , the regulation that the basis uses (for example, country or community are legislative, or issuance bibliographical reference) , its the definition is " natural " or " natural origin " .

If the product contains the natural part of 95% , so remain what do 5% have to concern with Iso 16128?

Any.

Because did not include " blacklist " , 5% what ISO 16128 standard allows to bring into any chemical composition permission synthetic raw material.

This is problem place. Those who remain 5% it is a true Pandora's box, in this box, may discover potential harmful and chemical part.

As contrary as this, natural the detailed list of the accredit part that the label with organic cosmetic includes to list in accessory and process. Accordingly, the permission petrochemistry part of 5% is controlled strictly.

What is the risk of consumer?

Believing cosmetic is natural, claiming to pack because of it is natural or organic more or less, but it also contains open to question synthesis part.

According to ISO 16128 standard, enough computation of mark aux will be able to and the percentage that show organic in its finished product part (" according to ISO 16128 standard, the natural part that contains X% " ) . They the benefit in the credit from international Organization for Standardization.

The problem is, they won't point out open to question composition possibly, include natural with organic composition (silicon ketone, the phenol of phenol, the) such as mineral oil.

For example, "Contain the natural part of 80% " blame warning consumer may think this is a kind of good product, although of the others 20% it is the synthetic composition with harmful synthesis.

ISO standard 16128 whether by attestation orgnaization attestation?

Not

What the BIO cosmetic with classics attestation and the form that submit to ECocT, Veritas or Cosmeert attestation orgnaization differ is, will right " ISO 16128 " cosmetic undertakes attestation. Esteem standard.

Organization for Standardization (ISO 16128) what is control measure of the regulation?

Only the supplier proved the natural per cent of every kinds of composition. What differ with biology attestation product is, do not need pair of organic material buy average travel test and verify or prove, the product of ISO 16128 standard that the control that records to the production of the organic product of attestation will not need to standardize.

These information will be based on simple allegation and the raw material supplier of sincere letter.

Do not have in ISO 16128 " BIO attestation " of guarantees class status trace a concept.

Where can we consult ISO 16128?

ISO 16128 standard is paying fee only use in the visit. The first part is 61 euro, the 2nd part is 92 euro.

Be in " COSMMS " in, cosmetic company the product labelled its member, in website Https://cosmos-standard.org/(form and file) in offer freely.

What do we have to suggest to consumer?

Consumer can choose their cosmetic, and the trap that does not fall into afforest, they can rely on the historical label of cosmetic, this is to be based on strict, pack transparently, for instance the norms of Cosmos.

All consumer do not want to become the expert of appraisal label and component detailed list. Label is to reliable quality is offerred to assure in be purchased daily here. To consumer, best settlement method is cosmetic label. After this, customer will choose a brand according to his be fond of and acceptance.

Nature and biology cosmetic: Consumer is right 13 problems of standard ISO 16128

未经允许不得转载:News » Nature and biology cosmetic: Consumer is right 13 problems of standard ISO 16128