On May 23, 2006, su Mou of person be executived is owed because of repaying, be sued to come by Wu Mou Sichuan hill court, this courtyard adjudicates Su Mou is returned to Wu Mou still loan principal reachs accrual 100 thousand yuan, after adjudicating become effective, wu Mou applies for to be carried out compulsively, because Su Mou misses, also do not have can offer executive property, sichuan hill court rules break down is carried out lawfully. On December 16, 2014, wu Mou applies for to restore to carry out to Sichuan hill court.
Put on record is investigated
Classics court is found out, account of salary of industrial and commercial bank came in March 2011 salary extends to add up to in succession between January 2013 228 thousand yuan, every time salary passes ATM machine draw money namely to Zhang hind. Another bank account is in under one's name to came to also stocked 140 thousand yuan in succession in August 2014 in March 2013 by draw money, consumption, tie capable reimbursement and refus not reimbursement, in view of person be executived Su Mou escapes the behavior that carry out, sichuan hill court moves this case send put on record of public security mechanism to investigate.
On August 17, 2015, su Mou of the accused person is seized by public security mechanism, a fact concludes the case for narrating according to the facts after bringing to justice, carry out person Wu Mou to pay leasehold money 222 thousand yuan please at active on August 21 Xiang Shen.
Court decision
Sichuan hill court thinks, su Mou of the accused person knows perfectly well the court decision that has go into effect to need to carry out, be in capable to fulfill adjudicative circumstance to fall, refus does not implement forensic court decision, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out adjudicative blame, should grant to penalize lawfully. The accusation of public prosecution mechanism holds water. After considering the accused person Su Mou is brought to justice, conclude the case for narrating according to the facts a fact, admit his guilt of one's own accord in front courtyard careful, belong to honest, can punish lightly to its lawfully. Su Mou of the accused person already gave paid executive money, obtain application to carry out person Wu Mou to forgive, but take into consideration the circumstances is punished lightly to its. Reason first instance does not carry out adjudicative blame to sentence set term of imprisonment of Su Mou of the accused person with refus 10 months, probation a year.
--------End-------
Composing / group of Anhui of today's top headlines
