Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expen

Instantly, promote ceaselessly as living environment, owner served character to have higher demand to property, happen from time to tome with the dispute between property company. Many owner think, the service that wants property company only is put in the flaw, oneself pay property fee with respect to refus having right. Current, relate the issue to the court, commonner is the case that property company hands in property to expend a problem to owe and prosecutes owner. So, OK really to property service dissatisfaction does refus hand in property expend? Two case take you to come below specific understanding.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

1

Case one

Something estate company appeals to citizen Zhang Mou to the court, the property that asks its pay 2015 year serves cost and corresponding penalty due to breach of contract. Zhang Mou thinks the service quality of property company and service rate difference are too big, did not achieve the demand that serves a contract, answer to pay property fee according to the real service circumstance of property company.

In front courtyard careful, zhang Mou referred a few photographs to be used at proving property company is done not have to stipulate according to the contract proffer course of study serves, the establishment such as the afforest that includes a village and housing does not defend the case that reach the designated position. But the photograph that Zhang Mou refers cannot mirror a property company to did not press the fact that provides property service about in the round, and the case that its cannot provide other evidence to prove property company offers a service not to reach the designated position again.

The property service contract that property company and countersign of owner committee member conclude is lawful and active, property company and collectivity village owner all should be fulfilled according to it. Although Zhang Mou thinks the property that property company offers serves to did not achieve property to serve the demand of the contract, but can not offer sufficient evidence to give proof, what reason raises a position to its, do not grant to collect a letter.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

2

Case 2

A company fastens the urban district one of owner of some commerce building, because of this company not field of the property cost 2016, motor vehicle safeguards pay cost add up to more than yuan 50 thousand, be appealed to to come by property company court. The property service fee that A company thinks property company is sued did not arise partly, if property company puts forward to stop elevator to use of purpose, bring about its building to cannot rent accordingly, for this, a company asks to deduct its to fail to use the service fee during elevator serves. To this, property company represents the case of elevator of nonexistent intended out of service, actual it is elevator appeared breakdown, made processing actively already, already returned to normal after use, a company position guides its cannot rent because of elevator disuse building, not agree with with the fact.

In case cognizance, because A company did not refer sufficient evidence to prove about elevator of property company intended out of service or the fact that safeguard elevator not in time, the court is right the opinion of A company, did not grant to collect a letter. Final, the court supported the property that property company holds to serve field of cost, motor vehicle to defend fee, but undertook adjustment to the standard of fine for delaying payment lawfully.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

Look from two afore-mentioned case, the contradictory reason of owner all did not obtain those who get a court of justice to adopt, investigate its reason is the inadequacy that depends on quote. From the point of dispute of this kind of lawsuit, owner refus is handed in or owe the reason that pays property fee, the likelihood has certain proper sex, wait for a service like the Bao Jie that property company offers, security, do not accord with contract agreement to wait, but because owner cannot provide enough, significant evidence,try to prove, as a result wins forensic support harder. But, retreat one pace to tell, the opinion of even if owner is adopted, also be not is to absolve its to meet cost obligation directly, it is to join particular details of a case likely more, take into consideration the circumstances reduces property cost, because this refus makes property,cost is not those who maintain self interest " good plan " .

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

In the life, because each owner is right,property service is having the standard that differs severally and demand possibly, hard to avoid can produce issue between owner and property company. Encounter a problem, should appeal to as far as possible with reasonable means report beg, and rather than forms a kind of intense antagonism concern. The way that owner makes property expend with refus undertakes remonstrant not only cannot from go up at all solve a problem, still can form a kind of vicious circle, bring about property to serve quality to continue to drop, what damage finally still is the interest of all owner.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

So, face property to serve a problem, owner should how does rational thought for the time being? We think, effective by way of still passes committee of owner congress, owner to wait to serve a company to put forward bargaining to property, undertake supervisory and hold the right. When necessary, also can start legal process to ask to change property company. In the meantime, serve the problem of existence in the light of property, owner should gather relevant evidence in time, so that these data are submitted in necessary hour, in order to confirm property service does not accord with conventional circumstance. Of course, owner also can adopt legal approach, do not accord with a standard in order to serve for, to lodge a complaint asks property company undertakes corresponding responsibility of breach of contract.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

Altogether, compose builds harmonious property concern, build harmonious village atmosphere, be helpful for improving the integral environment of the village not only, also be helpful for promoting the whole of the village quality. To this, still need all owner and the joint efforts that property serves an industry.

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?

Character: Li Qian

Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend? Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expend?
未经允许不得转载:News » Does with property of case view Piao the service differ you can does refus hand in property to expen