Often somebody refers legal question to the lawyer. Have a plenty of through small letter or phone, also have a plenty of with lawyer interview.
Advisory question is multifarious, perhaps signed a contract to encounter break a contact with the person, or the money that others lends him is not returned, or partnership dispute, or person damages, or case of administrative punishment, criminal is waited a moment.
Although meet with the lawyer, majority also is what testimony material also is not taken, shake from side to side of him shake from side to side came.
Receive electrify sentence, perhaps see a lawyer, describe the issue that oneself confront to the lawyer, say others owes money to be not returned, say others breach of contract agrees, say to fasten ethnic group to plant not sincere letter heartless justice. Ask a lawyer next: "Can be my thing sued? Sued can you win? Sued can you win??
Actually, can change a setting to be imagined. For instance Zhang San looks for a doctor, say the child caught a cold, ask how the doctor should do? Can you eat such-and-such kind of patulin? It is good to eat this kind of patulin? Such, but did not get the child. Just think, how should be the doctor diagnosed? How to treat? How to answer you?
Want to let others solve a maths to inscribe to him than consistent individual again, he says to the family: "There are 3 numbers here, 1, 2, 3, is you see addition to be equal to a few ah? Be equal to 6? " such problem, pupil is met, still use ask a lawyer? The person that is asked besides say down you besides, can you have other conclusion?
Although have verdict, either is the conclusion with you same? Is this kind solved what sense is there?
Two respects, be to seek advice from what the person says " 3 numbers " right incorrect? 2 it is this thing, should apply namely " addition " will calculate, why be multiplication, or division, or the mixture operation of all sorts of operation means?
Return law to seek advice come up. Seek the person that the lawyer consults, he himself thinks, what he states is legal fact, what he thinks he is stated is 1, 2, 3, and be in jural not be certainly however, perhaps be in jural can not prove certainly.
On one hand, the cognitive difference of everybody can have very big error to factual allegation, serve as party especially. On the other hand, regard illegal keep under control as professional personage, what he says is objective fact merely just.
Probably, in the lawyer or the judge looks, those alleged facts that you say, it is A actually, b, c just, 1 what be not you to say, 2, 3. Objective fact, be in jural not certain and useful, have legal fact only, just have legal sense. There is a space between objective fact and legal fact, the join of this distance, it is evidence. That is to say, have the fact that evidence can prove only, just be legal fact.
Moreover, the processing of the person that a lot of moment seek advice to legal general affairs, oneself have idea quite, want to let a lawyer prove. But, the person that seek advice is very much the idea about processing, it is to build in him himself the pair of law, understanding to him fact is mixed over understanding foundation, it is not certain regulation of be good law, not be best legal plan certainly. This resembles above the example of the mathematical operation that move, the algorithm that you say is not correct certainly.
So, according to the plan of the fact that the person that seek advice states, design, the conclusion that general meeting reachs the person that seek advice wants.
Also some looks for a lawyer to seek advice, say: "You help the lawyer I am written write, a few words go. " also someone says: "Liu lawyer, you look for a person to wrote an indictment to be become to me, other myself do, do not entrust you. " there also are two sides inside this.
It is, is the lawyer writes material where to be written casually write what go? That should study a fact, that wants applicable legislation, besides cite the classics, have maneuverability even. If your thing, the lawyer writes half page paper to you casually, dare be you used?
This lawsuit is arbitral case, the mainest job writes indictment namely, choice of analysis of factual investigation, testimony, train of thought, legislation was included inside this applicable, court is arbitral perhaps appoint make choice of... such job, you say to ground of lawyer mention lightly, "Help me write an indictment " , taking indictment to go next, do not have a lawyer what thing. Allow lawyer condition why can!
2 be, although the lawyer draws up plan comes, be not professional personage to be being taken go operating, also can operate so that do not become model.
Somebody was taking such plan to ask a lawyer, flatter oneself got the result, go back oneself are operated. The operation does not go down, perhaps appeared unfavorable result, blame a lawyer conversely again: This lawyer says incorrectly.
The reason that this is yourself obviously causes ah, what concerns with the lawyer?
1, taking all stuff.
Oneself are not done accept or reject, give entirely lawyer, let a lawyer comb. You think trashy material, perhaps be in lawyer eye, it is the crucial evidence that can turn round a situation.
2, come to see a lawyer.
is not to let a lawyer see you. Time is the biggest cost to the lawyer. Now lawyer rate, time collecting fees is horary 500 yuan - 5000 yuan. Those half hour on the road, it is half hours to you, to the lawyer, he lost the chance that serves for others, he has cost.
3, the cause that shows oneself to the lawyer.
is not to say its itself merely. Of course, brillant lawyer comes up to be able to figure out your purpose.
Not constrained also at oneself fixed target, in advisory process, but of basis and lawyer discuss wait to give afresh emend or change.
4, cooperate a lawyer to clear up a fact.
The fact that objective bona fide involves to lawyer allegation, complement. Distrust this lawyer, do not look for him. Had confronted a lawyer, say the half hides an in part even, not be well-advised practice.
5, clear him sky, listen to a lawyer how to say first, discuss with the lawyer again.
Give evidence and target lawyer, hear the lawyer's opinion first. Oneself have different opinion, can discuss repeatedly with the lawyer.
6, did not forget to pay fee to the lawyer.
Because consult a business that is a lawyer, is not recreational with social obligation. Ask an undergraduate to make teaching in home now horary hundreds of, ask a person to coach the child plays piano to get on 1000 hourly, the lawyer helps a person solve headachy legal problem, the belongings that this affects a person, money, honorary, free, even life, do you feel it can compare family education, than coaching is piano easy?
7, you need not ask a lawyer to have a meal.
What the lawyer is short of least of all is meal bureau, the lawyer still has a lot of material to want to write, a lot of books want to read. If want to express the feeling that appreciate really, ask on reference one.
Of course, all premise of above are, you should look for a lawyer that relies on chart to seek advice. Just rely on chart as to what kind of lawyer, not be the content that the article should say any more.
