The man puts a bank in the morning 200 thousand, afternoon only remnant 35 yuan! Whether should be t

From of old, compatriots has a habit. Had surplus money to be able to choose stock money the bank inside. Have a kind of ineffable trustful feeling to the bank, the feeling puts money inside the bank, do not take on the safe side, still accrual can be taken, not be kill two birds with one stone.

But the development as the society, the incident that the bank has an accident emerges in endlessly. Just think, if your Qian Zaiyin travel is ineffable,was missing, how can you do? Whether can be the bank assumed again complete duty? Saw the story below, probably you knew.

This thing happening has very long period of time, mr Li dealt with a piece to borrow in a bank of place write down card, retained mobile phone name. Stocked that day 200 thousand into this account.

But, making what Mr Li did not think of is, go to a bank turning that day afternoon Zhang, be informed however bank card remaining sum is insufficient. This frightened Mr Li to jump indeed. How did the money that just went in disappear without trace?

Mr Li was checked trade record discovery, fell that day of midday 13:43, this piece of oneself bank gets stuck, turn through net silver went out 199950, add begin add to expend 15 yuan, the remaining sum inside card has 35 yuan only.

Those who make Mr Li interrogative is, oneself never had opened net silver, how can be you transferred through this kind of means?

Find out discovery later, somebody blocked account to open two nets silver and mobile phone channel with the bank of Mr Li, turn the deposit of Mr Li to bank account of Hu Mou through individual net silver.

To this, mr Li thinks, implementation net silver turns Zhang function, need signs relevant agreement to debut in bar. The bank did not head for the case that handles relevant formalities to fall in him, opened this function, bring about him bank to block remaining sum by pilfer, to this, bank should in full charge.

Subsequently, one paper indictment told the bank the court, one adjudgement bank is carried 2 into responsibility.

Forensic first instance thinks, identify turn the true bogus of Zhang, it is the main obligation that safeguard depositor safety must fulfil. Accordingly, in Zhang turning to trade on the net, the risk of generation ought to be assumed by the bank. Mr Li also exists not the responsibility with custodial appropriate. So, the court adjudicates finally, the bank compensates for Mr Li the loss expenses of 20% .

To this result, mr Li can be not accepted.

Subsequently, mr Li and higher court, bargaining this matter. Final amend a judgment is bank in full charge.

City class court thinks, the bank regards finance as the orgnaization, safety of the capital inside card of safeguard depositor bank is reached trade safe obligation.

The deposit inside card of Mr Li bank is transferred through individual net silver. According to the regulation, depositor opens individual net silver to turn Zhang remittance function, need face of bank site ark to deal with relevant formalities.

In this case, the bank did not open individual net silver to turn to ark face in Mr Li below the circumstance of Zhang remittance function, do sth without authorization opens this function for Mr Li through other way, bring about Mr Li under one's name to deposit money to be transferred by other.

The bank is put in major mistake, answer loss of Mr Li deposit to assume full responsibility. Final judgment of 2 careful court adjudicates, some bank recoups loss of Mr Li deposit 199965 yuan.

Final, this thing ended eventually. Also a lot of netizens express the view that gave his: "Origin is a bank, it is bank in full charge for certain " , "Even expenses of loss of bank compensation spirit, engage in a lawsuit not to expend energy manpower? " , "Incident surface last be an end, but still cannot rescue to the loss of Mr Li " ...

So, how do you look to this thing?