Holand " faithful newspaper " (Trouw) the verdict that reported ISO of complete Holand student union is discussed, any commitment that after showing cabinet has not fulfill compensation to cancel basic stipend, make, because of,the weak force group in the student got the influence of this measure, affirmatory higher education investment has not come true.
Holand cancels basic stipend from 2015, instead loan institution. Introduce loan system for the student and not be basic stipend, be before Ministry of Education grows Jet Bussemaker (PvdA of the Labour Party) one of the mainest outstanding achievement since appearing on the stage, he is affirmatory at that time, with save the money that come down to invest higher education.
The anti of loan institution had been conveyed 2014 be anxious relatively, rise besides the initiative cost of estate market and labour market namely besides, student graduation still will face liability of high specified number.
Phenomenon of higher education imparity increases somewhat
In addition, the person that oppose loan system thinks, the chance that enters higher education got restrict, the society is low rank estate is special institution of boycott student loan.
These all forecasting proving after 4 years is a fact. A few days ago, investigation points out, the imparity phenomenon that teachs a respect increased further. If the student has study loan, guaranty of buy course of study may apply for to borrow money scarcely after students graduate so.
Affirmatory billions of investment has not come true
The 1 billion euro that come down is saved to still was not used at higher education after cancelling basic stipend. 2026, predict to will extend brushstroke the amount of 820 million euro, but, the one part of this capital, namely 200 million euro, what because compensate OV of student public traffic,had gotten stuck is economic and consumed.
Rolled out 2015 when loan system when, governmental commitment will maintain student traffic to block the measure of OV, can enlarge limits even.
" faithful newspaper " still point out, advanced even institute and university itself, not was in to them affirmatory 2015 have any investment to education.
The fund that the government endows course is opaque
Every are professional, besides the student's tuition, still have the fund that the government endows, call Instellingstarieven, this is the educational funds that colleges and universities obtains.
Cross urban student to organize the investigation of ISO according to this, the funds of the university is " opaque " .
Several years since, the student of higher education can choose a major only each, can obtain the fund that endow from governmental office consequently, so called Instellingstarieven. If reelection repairs the 2nd major, cannot get the support of governmental financing. But the research of NOS makes clear, this respect the cost difference of each universities is very big.
The basis steps the investigation that urban student organizes, still do not understand amount how distributive, and differ price difference exists between learned identical research project greatly.
NOS interviewed university institute (VSNU) . This association says, because prohibit,the price competes, the university cannot be completely transparent, very difficult also mathematical calculation what cost includes the funds that obtains in this university in.
