China business signs up for dispatch (Ning Jun of exercitation reporter Wang Na's reporter) go up from the net, cosmetic of sham and well-known trademark is purchased in great quantities below the line, put within a house owned by a citizen to distribute money, sell be in toward shopkeeper. Classics appraisal, price of experience case cosmetic amounts to more than yuan 4.54 million, 4 months sell amount 2.06 million yuan. Yesterday, court of district of bridge of Xi'an city Ba heard this case publicly.
Procuratorate of Ba bridge area accuses, since 2016, some passes the Hubei man He Mou that lives in Ba bridge area coarse channel purchases network, line the cosmetic of the many well-known trademarks such as Wei Ya of a large number of sham and natural hall, Oulaiya, Ni, deposit inside rented a house owned by a citizen wait for one's chance is sold. By He Mou some is in charge of connection buying the home and settle accounts payment for goods, xiao Mou of its daughter He Mou, son-in-law, fellow-townsman makes some undertake goods, deliver goods keeps abreast of matching settle accounts of travel part payment for goods, sell this cosmetic toward Bei Si of new the city zone the much place shopkeeper of especially integrated market. Police basis was informed against on September 28, 2017 seize Xiao Mou, He Mou, Xu Mou, he Mou some will be seized on October 11.
Classics appraisal, price of experience case cosmetic (goods is worth amount) more than yuan 4.54 million, came in May 2017 during September, sale amount adds up to more than yuan 2.06 million.
The procuratorate thinks, person of 4 the accused is a purpose with gaining profit illegally, the commodity that knowing perfectly well is sham registered trade mark and give sale, ought to find out punishment duty in order to sell the commodity blame of sham registered trade mark.
The He Mou that was born 1991, from enter a court to rise to sob all the time, still have father with what she sits in dock together why Xiao Mou of such-and-such, husband, fellow-townsman makes some.
"It is my person is doing these things, daughter, son-in-law works to me, the daughter just is taken care of at ordinary times child and cook, husband is in charge of deliver goods, replenish onr's stock and run business is I am being done " , some weighs He Mou, what he does not know to sell is fake, be the business charter that has seen stock trader. He firm those who say not to exceed 8 yuan into valence " brand " cosmetic is not a holiday.
Husband and daughter say not to know these things are fake, "My father has seen eligible proof to me, myself also used these cosmetic " , he Mou argue says.
Some counsel for the defence is opposite He Mou sale amount demur, say the result of judicatory appraisal shows, only " natural hall " violated trademark, and the difference of label presence essence of other product brand and quality goods, the cosmetic that so person of indemonstrable the accused sells violated the trademark of the other trademark cosmetic outside dividing natural hall, since do not have tort, when computational sale cannot calculate inside except the cosmetic amount beyond natural hall.
This case classics is close careful of 5 hours front courtyard, adjudge choose an auspicious day.
