Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

Often see in abroad a few animals overrun, our netizen always speaks say: Let me come, eat a few class to protect an animal you say continuously. It is delicate foreign country likewise so factitious him what does dish to eat, even others of have the aid of? So is the key of the problem in where?

Someone once said: "The foreigner does not have too large interest to eating, they are told go to the lavatory how to come. " this bit small make up also approve of, be like a few foreigners their normal food is a few burger king, potato, hot dog, sandwich, biscuit, a few food such as the egg, now and then come a vegetable salad of what appetizing more do not tell what belly-worship.

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

Be the foreigner does not have too large interest to eating really? This can be the main track that keeps life, actually main reason or they won't be done do not know how to eat, if their dietary culture has us,such hair are abounded nonexistent also, crayfish, boar, asian carp ran rampant.

Cite a simple case: Be like the potato that British National People's Congress loves, once was in England in election of course of one second country, the Englishman considers as consistently: Tomato patch! Tomato patch! Tomato patch! But they ate a few potato of hundred years to also be not fried,give silk of a dish of potato to come, at that time someone should say: The foreigner won't fry this working procedure! Be ah is what didn't this confirm their food culture onefold?

Still the netizen says: "Foreigner very carry feed, the fish that has like them is the fish of sea mile, do not have the fish of fresh water river. " such really, this ability had the Asian carp that runs rampant in Australia and United States. True still to cruelly oppress foreigner carry feed, the fish that they feel the fish in the sea is to did not pass pollution ate to be at ease, at the same time sea fish does not have the fish bone with river tiny fish, clear rise convenient, OK and immediate a place of strategic importance eats in the mouth, had arrived apparently lazy cancer is terminal.

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

But we cannot oversight a problem, why to meet nurturance is used to this kind? Still be drag in arrives on the rich sex of dietary culture, be like the chopstick that we use, in trader week when had had a record. Watch the knife and fork that the foreigner uses instead, also have history of hundreds of years only. We know to clear with knife and fork cruelly oppress broken bone is very troublesome issue, do not importune a foreigner to eliminate flush Asian carp with the way that makes dish eat so.

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

A few netizens still say: "The thing that the foreigner has belongs to their culture category. " our anatomize reasonable really. Why do a few foreigners say our what eats? Eventually because we do not have too much contraindication to eating,its reason still is. Watch a foreigner why to always use cautious attitude to eating instead, be like the crab that runs rampant in the United States and Europe, perfect explained this, because do not have the description that has crab in their culture, be to object eating crab more in a few culture this kind of behavior.

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

Still cite a simple case, we know to be in India always is to eating this also also does not eat that, the foreigner is compared in a few respects more severe, we see their culture scope, the word that uses a foreigner says: In corporeal culture development arrives today, the Indian still can hold their devotional thing, it is a miracle simply.

What is are they devotional? Explaining, say to eat beef this problem, the person of the whole world eats beef almost, and the Indian still won't eat to now, their devotional it is thus clear that culture has much dreariness.

Flush animal won't be taken to do dish to eat to still result from in foreigner of a few respects their high gent culture, the boar that runs rampant in the United States for instance, include pork to be in inchoate when pork belongs to flesh of eatable of black talented person kind, there still is some of foreigner to won't choose pork to eat today. Also poor food says, this view is in Euramerican country is very popular also now, the matter that does not become dish to eat in a lot of moment e.g. flush mussel besides won't do still have even if poor food says.

Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?

We are seeing a foreigner why to take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat now, besides won't eat besides, mix in dietary culture consuetudinary respect is main influencing factor, can say these influencing factor accord with the place that runs rampant in abroad to use an animal. Picture origin network

未经允许不得转载:News » Why doesn't the foreigner take the animal that runs rampant over there them to do dish to eat?