Dispatch of legal evening paper (reporter Zhu Jianyong) because of network dispatch " Wu Yifan is responded to " by drug taking " very innocent, adept person assures with the head he has been been infected with absolutely " , wu Mou is sentenced tort, wu Yifan makes an apology and compensate for to the actor. This morning, the 2 careful of this case are in Beijing one quadrangle is sessional.
Wu Mou was in company of Baidu net dispatch on December 19, 2017 of operation " date of a hunderd schools " reach byte of jumpy company operation " a date " the text is released on media oneself " Wu Yifan is responded to " by drug taking " very innocent, adept person assures with the head he has been been infected with absolutely " .
After this, wu Yifan encroachs its reputation to counterpoise with the partial content of caption of experience text chapter and text, wu Mou and company of Baidu net dispatch, byte jumpy company appeals to to the court, the requirement deletes experience text section, close number of Wu Mou Zhang, ask to make an apology, compensatory loss.
After court of first instance is tried, think, release article caption and text ending to emphasize from Wu Mou " he did not touch drugs to throw my head come down " wait for content to look, have misdirect public to form Wu Yifan to still be suspected of in fact apparently " drug taking " conclusion. And be suspected of " drug taking " negative opinion stars to recreation, undoubted meeting reduces its society evaluation and commercial value badly, reason Wu Mou releases experience text chapter to be put in apparent subjective ill will, form tort.
Cognizance of court of first instance is maintained, company of Baidu net dispatch and byte beat the company is in receive after complaining material, deleted experience case content in time, already fulfilled legal obligation, wu Yifan asks to be adopted to Wu Mou ban speech, shut the measure such as Zhang date to lack rationality, the court does not grant to support. Court of first instance adjudicates Wu Mou makes an apology and recoup a loss.
After first instance adjudicates, wu Mou appeal reachs Beijing one quadrangle, its think chapter of text of its compose experience does not have subjective ill will, did not build to Wu Yifan weigh an influence.
This morning, 2 careful are in this case open a court session of court of the first intermediate people tries Beijing. Appellant Wu Mou comes to the court, wu Yifan did not appear in court, should appeal to for you by agent.
The court investigates level to express, wu Mou says, this article is not to think Wu Yifan drug taking, just is to help Wu Yifan word of clear, come to an agreement or understanding. The viewpoint that Wu Mou calls the Wu Yifan in the article drug taking is to come from a netizen to comment on, but oneself more emphasis Wu Yifan is impossible drug taking, be like " Wu Yifan has this wicked heart, also do not have this thief bravery " .
"This article is comment sex article, not be general news, there is the meaning of caption party really on caption, but now network caption not such? " Wu Mou says, oneself date is not sale date, also did not seek profit with this article, do not consider as tort so.
Person of Wu Yifan representative, no matter Wu Mou is article conclusion or purpose are pointing to Wu Yifan drug taking, had formed calumniatory, wu Mou still takes the opportunity later hype, caused evaluation of Wu Yifan society to reduce, hope court renders judicial court decision. Baidu, head the respect says cognizance fact of court of first instance is true.
Level is mediated in the court, wu Mou says to be willing to accept mediation, and Wu Yifan respect does not accept mediation.
This case was not adjudged on the court.
