People of all the change that be torn open do not hope to face forced releasing, also be everybody the circumstance of be in a state of anxiety. Small pose the case that cites an enterprise to tear open change dimension authority to succeed today, how does dimension authority succeed everybody sees him together.
Mr Zhao open limited company of a biological product, for open company need leases the land, so the village of he and place was signed " land right of administration rents a contract " and the house was built on this land. Encounter later tear open change, the street agency of Mr Zhao and place was not reached with respect to compensation problem consistent, so street agency is in harbor to was not informed beforehand, below the case that also did not show any legal copy clerk, organize about a hundred assist alarm, staff member and 4 grab, the family company legal representative and him takes the demolished Mr Zhao illegally factory building after leaving compulsively.
In forced releasing process not only a lot of things are buried in remains, still something is pulled with the car by the staff member directly, mr Zhao makes a prompt decision signed up for alarm, but public security mechanism rejects to go out alarm.
The forced releasing like such robber true nobody is in charge of? Mr Zhao pharynx does not leave this energy of life in the heart, mentioned to the court then lawsuit. In litigant process, the compensation tearing open change that the announcement tearing open change that Mr Zhao took out place proves to him enterprise is in plot is dominant of the person that tear open change, talking things over also undertake with the person that tear open change, conclude so the person be benefited that gives forced releasing and the person that carry out is the person that tear open change. Not only such, 15 pieces of pictures that Mr Zhao still took out forced releasing spot and 3 pieces of CD proved to prove forced releasing spot has Li Mou of vice director of the person that tear open change and staff member Zhang Mou, the street that is place did an organization to carry out forced releasing behavior. Additional, mr Zhao calls the police after the accident get receive (newspaper) place alarm registration form, in order to prove mechanism of classics public security understands, it is local street does carried out forced releasing behavior.
Although place is street,running the plant with Mr Zhao is to violate build for undertake rejoining, but whether is the building that the court thinks the company is built as before illegal construction, do not belong to the cognizance limits of this case, also do not affect the cognizance of qualification of Mr Zhao main body. The building of Mr Zhao company is demolished to be a fact, carried out to who demolish behavior, both sides of former, the accused all provided corresponding evidence, but the evidence that accuser provides is more sufficient, provide objectivity more, combining a court to move taken testimony to be able to hold the house of Mr Zhao company lawfully is local street does demolish, and this kind demolishs behavior to do not have legal factual basis and legal basis again, so the court is maintained finally demolish behavior to break the law.
Can saying authority of Mr Zhao dimension is successful is with him himself of itself sober, sagacious do not divide. A series of evidence that Mr Zhao provides are the valid proof that strives for rights and interests for oneself. Warn company of each change that be torn open so, the number is numerous with the manner overbearing cannot from go up at all solve a problem, learning use statute measure to protect his just is expedient!
