Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are! Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

The closest Chengdu 7 in problem of safety of experimental school food causes wide attention on the network, each are big media also reports eagerly, food safety problem is pushed again to where the wind and the waves are highest.

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Look how to return a responsibility together!

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Its origin is friend of a piece of small letter the graph that encircle cut is transmitted extensively, weigh Chengdu 7 in the exposure of problem of safety of experimental school food, because a student is long-term the body is unwell, domestic strip goes discovering after Beijing examination, the department is brought about because of eating degenerative food for a long time, this famous expert is then senior " lie staff member of dining room of disguise oneself as of bottom dining room, obtain a problem to feed material evidence eventually " .

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Be shocking it seems that? The back after letting a person can't help one cool, the health of body and mind that how goes down to you can ensure the child does such food eat? One stone arouses 1000 billow, parents gather in school doorway to beg in succession view, police also is participated in with superintendency branch among them, undertake investigating mixing to incident reductive.

On March 15, supervisory management board of market of region of lukewarm river of the Chengdu City released the first batch to detect the bulletin of the result. Content shows, in the spot of partial parent testimony falls, to beefsteak, hamburger (the flesh places steamed bun) , the sampling such as bowel of skin of whip of salty yoke, egg, ham 19 batch, place sample thief all is inside the expiration period. And examine the report shows, what measure project of sample place check to all accord with requirement of food safety standard.

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Because everybody is right,examination result existence is oppugned, on March 16, market of lukewarm river region supervises management board to open a library again, undertake checking to sealing coffin of suffer form indigestion. Via detecting appraisal, detect in sample, surface of only noodles made from bean or sweet potato starch has macroscopical mildew spot, examine eventuate is unqualified.

Face food safety problem, we are necessary to gain ground " food safety law "

After all, the Chengdu in this incident 7 in experimental school is put in the circumstance with food unqualified safety really. Detect in sample, surface of noodles made from bean or sweet potato starch has mildew spot, involve disobey " food safety law " thirtieth sets 4 times medium at 6 o'clock.

" food safety law "

Thirtieth prohibits 4 times producing run following food, additive agent for food, food relevant product:

(3) the food that produces with the food raw material that exceeds the expiration period, additive agent for food, additive agent for food;

(6) acid of putrefaction, grease is defeated, mildew becomes foul and unripe bug, feculent, mix have eyewinker, adulterate adulteration or the provision with organic unusual character, additive agent for food.

When checking kitchen aspic library, after tone watchs video of the monitoring inside the kitchen, school square discovery has person doubt to be like make the false picture that feed capable person, with the picture likeness of the hype on the net.

Have new case again?

How to return a responsibility after all?

↓ ↓ ↓

Chengdu 7 in experimental school, the monitoring of corridor of the side outside library of aspic of storeroom of accident dining room shows, 21 when library of aspic of pass in and out of 08 minutes of renown parents, tear apart pack, take a picture. Arrive 22 when 24 minutes, in a many hour, number dials library of aspic of parent pass in and out, tear apart pack, take a picture, cent parent takes the ministry to feed material to examine throw the case that pack again inside or lose the ground to go up. Police introduction, till 13 days early 8 when make, still one dial batch of parent to come round, "The spot is destroyed very big " , when there is the parent to take a picture during, will differ intentionally feed material to undertake mixture.

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Police introduction, the 3 people name in monitoring picture is Wen Mou some (female) , king such-and-such, Peng Mou, 3 people undertook pink takes a picture scattering turmeric, upload the behavior of the network.

Among them, according to Wang Mou some own explain show collate case with police, some returns Wang Mou to enter red Qumisa wool abdomen take a picture, reveal the false appearance that wool abdomen mildew changes in order to show. Current, 3 people are accepting police investigation. Among them one admits, taking a picture is taking a mood, want to let everybody see the one side with bad school namely, "Allow authority unity is strength opposes school provision insecure. "Allow authority unity is strength opposes school provision insecure..

Have more very person, dispersed on the network " Chengdu 7 in what experimental school dining room eats to the student is corrupt is fed, contain toxin of many yellow aspergillus, bring about a student long-term diarrhoea, show parent dimension power, already the parent jumps the building dies " disloyal information, hind by other netizen a large number of transmit diffuse, cause abominable social effect.

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Face these groundless allegations, @ Chengdu is released undertake actively also refuting a rumor on small gain.

Oppose school provision insecure it is right admittedly

But in this incident

Make mildew intentionally change food picture is dispersed

The rumor that causes social panic is to reach what cannot take

And optional and dispersed disloyal rumor also breaks the law

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!

Dispersed in this incident disloyal rumor person, or will offend our country " criminal law " and " method of public security management " , serious still can be punished astringently by law.

" criminal law "

The 291st one of [spread blame of false and horrible information fictionally, intentionally] regulation:

Fictional and false danger affection, epidemic situation, the situation of a disaster, alarm affection, in website sth resembling a net other perhaps media uploads sow, perhaps be being known perfectly well is afore-mentioned false information, be in intentionally website sth resembling a net travels on other perhaps media, of order of serious disturbed society, handle battle of 3 years of the following set term of imprisonments, arrest or control; Cause serious consequence, be in 3 years of above 7 years the following set term of imprisonment.

" method of public security management "

The 25th has one of following action, be in 5 days of above 10 days to be detained below, can be in 500 yuan of the following amerce; The plot is smaller, place detain 5 days below or fine 500 yuan below:

(one) demagoguery, affection of danger of give false information, epidemic situation, alarm affection perhaps disturbs intentionally with other method of public order.

Face network groundless allegation

We want reason to face

Accomplish do not pass ballad not to believe rumor

Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!
未经允许不得转载:News » Is provision safe? Rumor? These practices cannot are!