I can suggest first choice 70-200f2.8, for instance you pursue inside this price get on that one to vacate dragon A009.
This is not quality of that camera lens better more serious perhaps problem, what we discuss now is which anxious paragraph more applicable your requirement, next interview talk about reason.
One, begin is easy degree.
Since raise this question, estimation yourself also is done not have very big hold, grow in anxious paragraph focussing compare intractability.
Figure films, gold is anxious paragraph we know is 85, 135 etc anxious the effect suits paragraph of fluoroscopy most.
70-200 covered these anxious paragraph, on composition of a picture more agile, more all-round, more than place pat, even if catch pat also can more competency.
2, draw quality performance.
Comparing quality is 85art for certain better, but although 70-200 is scorch, also be big 3 yuan of Jiao Duanzhi one, each 2.8 aperture 720 too won't poor, head of nonexistent what dog draws at least qualitative.
Satisfy use requirement so or do not have what problem, if go after empty to change,will look, film likewise distance, can keep balance in the 2.8 aperture of 170 end the empty of 85 1.4 influences ability. Of course composition of a picture is different also at that time it doesn't matter compares an import, just need not fear the empty of 720 influences ability too.
If be complete,place pat, 85art dominant position is larger.
If the environment outdoor is a few more complex, the shot that still needs certain scorch to compare will control a balance to film.
Of course, still be that word, both do not conflict, buy do not regret.
