How does the wife of the person that look upon throws dead to bite person Tai Di cut wrist to commit

I can say network force is too horrible simply only, these alleged dogginess personages are to do not have intelligence quotient, those who there is legal consciousness?

① 2 years old of sons are bitten by Tai Di, father child throws dead Tai Di under some stretch. Around colleger gets online this accident cloth, tong Mou's family is not legal person flesh, death of netizen make known to lower levels is chased after kill your.

② Tong Mou is in Jiangsu " 0 distances " apologize to the public on the program, but still surround hunt bowstring by dogginess personage continuity!

The wife king of ③ Tong Mou is such-and-such, cannot continue to bear unending phone to annoy eventually, short message curse, and the death that is aimed at 15 years old of sons is minatory, chose the suicide that cut wrist! She says: The person is inferior to a dog, I will atone by life.

④ distress! According to saying, the student that around institute theres is no lack of in the crowd of hunt is surrounded in these. Tai Di host still is hit in oneself inn 7 fold these acknowledgment nets to be duped the student of gunman.

⑤ " the child of boss of lucky river red inn runs, amuse the small Tai Di that bolt of inn of neck of the duck opposite side wears, small Taidike can be bullied by him, bit a child readily, next, lucky river red boss is animated beat dead small Tai Di " this is to describe the net of this incident to stick at the outset, can child of 2 years old bully we should like to ask appearance of Tai Dicheng what?

Above all the host that we can know a dog and child the gentleman had been reached reconcile. So the host that serves as a dog, had not investigated this affair again, so you serve as an alien, you can stand on the commanding elevation of a morality by what, go censuring others next, go even next hound somebody to death a person? Such behavior such alleged " dogginess personage " make a person disgusting really and not shame. Present these " love personage " on the commanding elevation that thinks oneself stand in morality, use oneself next so called love murders another person next, taking person blood to feed him " beloved wool child " still can speak plausibly and at length others is immoral.

I want to know how the psychology of these people thinks particularly. Their once once had sufferred what kind of harm! Should safeguard him proper pride with this kind of means? do they think their behavior is very correct so very of morality? It is to show oneself are so called nevertheless love is so called morality, not hesitate touching person blood to feed a dog.

More what is more,the rather that had dog host chosen to excuse that how do you feel to should be done even? Must let them with dead pay with life? is present society so horrible? Dog lot is inferior to human life all along is to be put where not by approbatory. And these idea according to these dogginess personages so should dog host also accept their network force euqally? After all his beloved wool child was killed he still can choose to reconcile with the murderer that kill a dog actually.

Do a lot of people say why should Ms. Wang choose to commit suicide? Change a number to change reopen of a place is inn same. But we are very much,the person did not realize network force to have after all how fierce, network force is we are unthinkable to the harm of party. Phone of address of front courtyard of original a distant relative with the same family name by exposure, the restaurant that Lai Yisheng puts is forced close, the ado of in quick succession phone, had caused intense blow to this average woman originally, more what is more,the rather that when she or a child that the mother should know him suffer person to browbeat, her heart breaks down extremely for certain. Her psychology below this kind of circumstance had broken down, she cannot accept her child to be harmed, the domestic regression that so she auxes would rather she chooses death to hope to be able to borrow this to be able to understand this one thing to let his is normal.

Force of this shows network is how terrible. I believe even if the settlement with this perfect finally job but also can leave countless shadows in the heart of this family. Ms. Wang served as an adult even to stay as a mother so heavy graven shadow more what is more,the rather that two his children. The blow that goes up in this kind of heart is not to say to be able to be eliminated very easily, this kind of influence may be all one's life.

Hope police can resolve this issue at an early date. Let Ms. Wang life can return to calm. I want to be opposite finally those " dogginess personage " say a word: Not be everybody dogginess also is not the dear one that all people that raise a dog can resemble your euqally crazed dog regarding his as, should not use too much occasionally so a few not lawful and the behavior that improper behavior goes intervening others raises a dog. What is there to concern again with you so in this one incident? Intervene forcibly, really disgusting!

Still have do not say not dogginess, there is skill not to want those working dogs to save you when having risk, because those work,dog and you raise those are different. After all the person has differring is a dog what is more,the rather that. Not! Not! Not! Dog of working dog pet!