" orchid booth foreword " since Tang Dynasty, be Wang Xi be servinged as all the time authentic work of be handed down from ancient times and be taken those who take consecrate. Although a variety of fabulous fantastic about him, anecdotical order is heard appear ceaselessly, but in ancient time, also a few book learns the home to had raised doubt to its authenticity. Of course, be in " Lan Ting foreword " below the case that is decided to be authentic work by admire, past dynasties scholar is great to its all without exception four prostrate, worship, criterion this kind of faint doubt was not caused impossibly also how old and resonant.
Feng Chengsu copy " Lan Ting foreword "
Apparently look, right " Lan Ting foreword " of the manner that hold a bosom, if,be Guo Lin. His " by Wang Xie of inscription on the memorial tablet with a tomb come up out of land the true puppet that considers Lan Ting order " publish at " cultural relic " 1965 the 6th period hind, caused a mighty uproar, brought about successive the iteration of 78 bouts debate, accordingly, academia is accepted Guo Mei if the first person that the Lan Ting since initiate considers debate.
Guo Mei is like work
But to " Lan Ting foreword " cup doubt, actually all through the ages all has. Tang Dynasty He Yanzhi, Liu Xiang is right " Lan Xu foreword " circulate of the account of the way different, kui of ginger of derivative the Southern Song Dynasty suspects " take an examination of Liang Wu to close like that right army more than 270 axes, at that time character " Huang Ting " , " Le Yi " , " accuse oath " , he Wei not as good as " Lan Ting " ? "This is prior doubt.
Guo Mei is like work
Take the place of to Qing Dynasty, li Wentian is in " Wang Zhong decides Wu Lanting originally " when flat and negative " Lan Ting foreword " the place that is Wang Xi is made, "It is the person between Sui Tang knows what Jin Renxi narrates Laozhuang and absurd adds " . "Die is not had right army book criterion already. If or have, surely its and " cook treasure child " , " cook Long Yan " close after that but " . This is to deny publicly " Lan Ting foreword " it is what make clear the first piece to make known one's position.
" cook Bao Zibei "
But what your person feels tiredly is, the paper that Guo Mei is like causes a mighty uproar in book world. I think. This may be to because of,be based on the following:
The first, if Guo Mei is having in contemporary China literary bound become highestly look;
The 2nd, if Guo Mei has again better discuss receive skill;
The 3rd, his paper is to be published in what the whole nation issues hundred thousands of " cultural relic " on the magazine.
However, still should have the account that takes an idea more greatly to go up.
Pan Baiying work
If Guo Mei puts forward " orchid booth foreword " for Tang Ren pseudograph when, chinese book world is lying of times of Shenyang Yin silent envelop under, south has Pan Baiying, white broadleaf plant, north has Wu Yuru, the attention that is 2 king successor. Point to now " Lan Ting foreword " it is pseudograph, not from go up at all shook the 2 belief that Wang Yi fastens, destroyed book home people the God that worships all the time? Interesting is, besides Shen Yin silent has had a few verses besides, other go-between of 2 king system has no an article to participate in consider debate and be " Lan Ting foreword " apologetic. With the theory of Pan Baiying, white broadleaf plant, can historiography is made narrate, but do not be good at arguing however. Be in especially if have eloquence extremely so,face Guo Mei when the boy or girl friend with very old qualification, they are self-conscious not be adversary. This is the result that 2 king system pays attention to skill not to weigh theory.
Work of white broadleaf plant
The adversary of the controversy is not go-between of 2 king system, but they think traditional calligraphy history unfavorable absurd adds final conclusion speculation and reverse a verdict. Comfortable, Shang Chengzun regards Zhang Shizhao, second year in high school as main controversy rival, especially date the 20 person that serve as main debate, become a kind to symbolize delicately simply.
Comfortable work of second year in high school
Consider debate about Lan Ting the circumstance of the engage in a battle of each viewpoint, elenchus, development, because of limited space, we do not make too detailed introduction, sum a few the most radical point of views parallelism slightly only, draw the outline of gives a the simplest rough sketch that consider debate, in order to serve as the jumping-off place that we evaluate to it.
1965, the Eastern Jin dynasty " inscription on the memorial tablet with a tomb of Wang Xingzhi's couple " , " Xie Kun inscription on the memorial tablet with a tomb " come up out of land around Nanjing. After Guo Mei is like so that see, write for base point with this namely civil point out, " orchid booth foreword " disagreement these subterranean unearthed relics are in the regulation on book wind, accordingly it should be pseudograph. And think further " " Lan Ting foreword " be told not only on calligraphy have a problem, be told namely from the article also have a problem " , affirmed " the article is forge ancient literary or art works at all, ink marks need not say also be a holiday " .
The paper that Guo Mei is like is in " bright daily " on after account, second year in high school is comfortable the first made echo. His " refute of true bogus of Lan Ting foreword is discussed " published on July 23, 1965 " bright daily " , if bring the Li Wentian that is a basis,in the light of Guo Mei postscript undertook disputing, and hold concurrently reached Kang Sheng and open result.
Comfortable work of second year in high school
The following discussion roughly around article and calligraphy two centers spread out: It is the problem of the article. The person that do not cross debate thinks thought itself of Wang Xi should the contradiction of be patient of, example that also has contradiction in fact, inadequacy is strange; 2 it is calligraphic problem debate person point out with a few remote the level that captures deserted civilian inscription on the memorial tablet with a tomb to cut worker worker goes measuring Wang Xi of generation book emperor level, it is ill-considered apparently. Of Wang Xi so great, surmounting a times because of him, encouraged new common practice. Because this denies this kind,also should not reason.
" annals of the Three Kingdoms " incomplete paper
August 1972 date " cultural relic " on the magazine, if Guo Mei is published again " the advance person that Xinjiang comes up out of land writes will of this < the Three Kingdoms > incomplete coils " , he thinks, the problem about orchid booth foreword " once had argued ardently 78 years ago, look in me, it is to had been solved. Not only post it is to forge, connect introductive also be mix into false " , this conclusion actually not correct, because " Lan Ting considers debate " because had had accepted verdict,be not is just of cease all activities, pound because of what the Great Cultural Revolution moves however. In fact, everybody did not persuade the both sides of the controversy who, just the viewpoint mix into that Guo Mei is like one clique entered setting of some kind of politics, the advantage with somebody much numerous influence, make the person produced such feeling just.
-- choose from Chen Zhenlian " law history of Chinese contemporary book "
Nod toward period heat:
