Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop s

Yesterday in the match of before dawn, portuguese became draw finally with Iranian battle, what Portuguese boast thunder Si Ma depends on the instep outside the move is universal flying celestial being unplugs for Portuguese team the head prepares first, and Iran also makes the same score adversary absolutely in at the last gasp, portuguese depending on group second position finally to give a clue successfully, and Iran can leave only world cup competition ground, c collect serves as Portuguese header, on the world one of optimal players, get the attention of fan, also got the key of Iranian player pays close attention to likewise, although C collect does not have a goal,Benchangbi is surpassed, but the focal character after he still made the game, his movement in the match caused fan people controversy.

In the match, c collect has a doubt to be like intended ancon to attack the action of adversary, after the judgment is being checked through VAR, still sentence card of C Luo Huang, and punish its end without red shop sign, if be intended ancon,attacking that is end of red shop sign certainly, fan people also expressed different point of view respectively after contest, that C collect is this movement intended ancon is attacked after all? Is the judgment sentenced this punish close unreasonable?

Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop sign? Is the judgment sentenced this punish after all close unreasonable?

A lot of famous football name constellation expressed their opinion:

Iranian bishop is experienced: Be in charge of C of your Mei Xi collect, ancon is attacked even if want red shop sign!

A Lan - hope to strap: I do not think C Luo Ying should be punished fall, although this is,one fouls, the judgment looked a lot of times from each angle, showing this is not an apparent big movement at least foul.

Er cuts before star heart Luo Ba thinks on the west: Look in me this the movement cannot be red shop sign, not be yellow shop sign even, the judgment is so long cannot decide, explain he himself won't know to should give a shop sign!

Then we view this action of C collect first!

Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop sign? Is the judgment sentenced this punish after all close unreasonable?

Above all this movement is player of C collect and Iran is contended for grab a body cause, look from this front angle, c collect eyes is staring at ahead and Iranian player also is visual ahead recedes the body that chooses oneself, and subsequently C collect has ancon attacks an action like a doubt Iranian player is subsequently flat.

From C collect in light of the viewpoint, c Luo Xiangqian runs move, the arm brandishs normally, this movement does not have very big question, is the problem this movement have a bit too big? And be put in the action that some kind of intended ancon attacks?

Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop sign? Is the judgment sentenced this punish after all close unreasonable?

From the point of Iranian player, iranian player is support is on C collect body really be like by C Luo Yi next the action that ancon attacks is knockdown, but answer in video put down, we can see, the arm of C collect just just comes up against Iranian player, he has fallen down, iranian player to C collect the reaction of this movement has a bit too exaggerative, and later the dissatisfaction that C Luo Yong places a hand helplessly to state to Iranian player this kind overreacts and but.

Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop sign? Is the judgment sentenced this punish after all close unreasonable?

Sentence in this in punishing, of the VAR that juridical classics alls over too much time put final decision to C collect show yellow shop sign, is not red shop sign, the episcopal practice that decides Iran to this is exceedingly malcontent, so why does the referee make this decision?

Above all, this movement is one fouls really, exceed elder brother to consider as the doubt that do not have a look, but this is not a red shop sign certainly, it why say is not certain to why say? Above all, c collect has to carry really the movement of ancon, but both sides is running at that time move contend for grab a body, of C collect carry the limbs movement that ancon can consider as a start of a race, and Iranian player just also is hit when back down, this movement C collect not constant presence has fair chance intentionally.

And C collect is hit in ancon when, do not have dozen of fact, just gently blow, and Iranian player however " special anguish " fall down, this kind of belt of Iranian player " act " fall down to also let a judgment think player of this movement Iran has " search " the idea of red shop sign.

And this piece of red shop sign of C collect to the action that next the match of Portuguese match and other team concerns key sex, so the judgment puts ability to make a decision through be being answered for many times, exceed elder brother to think juridical course is cogitative so this made decision is the reason that has him, also be fair and reasonable!

Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop sign? Is the judgment sentenced this punish after all close unreasonable?

Favorite friend nods an attention

Exceed elder brother to take you to appreciate different football

Welcome to reprint:News » Is the judgment sentenced punish deflection C collect? Does C collect ancon attack should red shop s
Share: