Geng Qu of Lu of member of water wood time is interviewed formally in before, talked about Bai Baihe's off the rails concerned content with agent. After interviewing an end a few days, appeared to contain in public date and small gain talk about at that time " Bai Baihe is off the rails " the relevant article of opinion on public affairs, and article author was that day is reportorial: Ning Ruichen!
Lu Geng Qu expresses, after the article special astonish! He feels to chat " Bai Baihe is off the rails " not be the interview content that determined with Ning Ruichen. The illicit of oneself and agent before this just is interviewed is close chat, attribute individual private matters one wants to hide, should not undertake publicity a report.
Lu Geng Qu
Lu Geng Qu still expresses, the relevant content in the article accords with a fact far from, think of with oneself original real intention have very big distinction. This reporter did not follow the principle of objective report, masses of misdirect of fictional instead content! These violated these privacy badly, affected oneself figure.
Accordingly, lu Geng Qu sued this reporter, ask he deletes relevant article, video, make an apology publicly, return all sorts of charge such as expenses of loss of seek redress spirit more than yuan 1.15 million!
Nevertheless, this reporter expresses to refuse to obey.
He says, in be interviewed that, both sides did not agree what content cannot make public what content. Still say Lu Geng Qu " propagandist period just puts forward afterwards, this is the hype of another kind of form in media. This is the hype of another kind of form in media..
28 days afternoon, in relief court of hold office at court of this law case is sessional, but did not adjudge on the court. What view does everybody have to this thing?
(if like, can pay close attention to me or give me a support, those who what wants to tell me is OK subjacent comment oh ~ )
