Group of Han rain during springtime " blame is subjective make a holiday " derivative more oppugns

The experimental result authenticity that academic investigation basically should be pair of experimental record authenticity and paper report undertakes cognizance; Motive, do not answer to investigate working content for learning.

Group of Han rain during springtime " blame is subjective make a holiday " derivative more oppugns conclusion of school square investigation

" finance and economics " reporter He Tao / civil Wang Xiao / editor

The incident of paper of Han rain during springtime that lasts more than two years had newest result.

Late on August 31, net of official of university of Heibei science and technology releases this school associate professor the investigation that group of Han rain during springtime removes draft paper and processing result say, committee of this school learning establishs board of inquiry, checked the data of all and primitive test that this paper involves seriously, entrust key laboratory of tripartite state to begin repeat test of test and verify, think the paper that remove draft already had the base that publishs afresh no longer, did not discover group of Han rain during springtime has the subjective case that make a holiday.

Although be in investigation process, award of the scientific research project that Han Chunyu asks go back is based on institute of the paper that remove draft to obtain actively, performance, honorary title, society holds a post etc. Concerned respect already cancelled the honorary title that Han Chunyu wins according to the regulation, the scientific research project that ended group of Han rain during springtime to assume called in scientific research funds, called in place of group of Han rain during springtime wins award of performance of school scientific research. Individual society holds a post to be being dealt with by legal process.

However, school afore-mentioned square findings are unappeasable controversy, caused more doubt instead: Make false fact? Have record of experiment of destroy by melting or burning and stuff? Why did Han Chunyu once give out to the public the view of a lot of antilogy?

"This conclusion is indescribable. " an expert that comes from biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to research a field expresses, the experimental result authenticity that academic investigation basically should be pair of experimental record authenticity and paper report undertakes cognizance. Conclusion of this one investigation does not carry the cognizance to the fact, do not announce the truth, did to the motive of group of Han rain during springtime however " innovation " conclusion. "Motive, should not be the content that academic investigation works. Should not be the content that academic investigation works..

"Nuo award class " achievement does not rely on chart, waste resource of much scientific research

Result of incident predestined relationship on May 2, 2016, england " natural " magazine child print " technology of natural · biology " the magazine is online a when published creation of Han Chunyu group new gene edits technical NgAgo - GDNA. According to the paper, it may be compared most the technology of editor of gene of CRISPR – Cas9 of fashionable is more accurate, more current.

The paper justs to be published, cause global biology academia enormous attention, be in especially home, han Chunyu is held in both hands by the heat of media, even NgAgo praise for " Nuo award class " achievement. Him Han Chunyu becomes a dazzling scientific research nova quickly.

However good times don't last long, be in the earliest in those days on May 27, first card overseas website that claims to cannot repeat test of Han rain during springtime did not appear on renown space BBS. After this, in the doubt of different platform sound ferments continuously.

"Place of big, nerve, biochemistry place, animal place, genetic place repeats Beijing University, short for Zhejiang Province not to come out his experiment, spent a lot of money and time, bosses are very angry. " water wood community " science " a card is written. Famous learning hits dummy square boatman to publish " rain during springtime of Han of university of Heibei science and technology " nobel prize class " repeatability problem of the experiment " , undertake publicity doubt to Han Chunyu, introduce controversy of this one learning the earliest masses eye shot.

Late on October 10, 2016, 13 home scientist asks tripartite undertakes investigating to Han Chunyu's experiment jointly. They think, this matter handles bad sentence, can affect the reputation of Chinese scientist badly, "Should let international division academia see us this domain (namely gene edits) the manner of Chinese scientist. "Should let international division academia see us this domain (namely gene edits) the manner of Chinese scientist..

Laboratory of biology of a lot of elements and the commercial company that pursue gene group editing a service think the whole world repeat a test. The United States university medicine center teachs Luoqiesite Joseph Miano tries a few times to repeat experiment of Han rain during springtime to fail, or of requirement Han rain during springtime announces secret method, or admits to make a holiday, the funds of a huge sum that asks Han Chunyu is obtained with him compensates for each labs the money that to repeat its the experiment creates and manpower loss, apologize to academia.

International turns Louis of banquet of original owner of gene technology association · Meng Teliu (Lluis Montoliu) also be in on July 29, 2016 to academician post a letter, the proposal stops test of rain during springtime of Han of test and verify, do not waste time, money and personnel again.

Repeat NgAgo test, experimental expenditure basically is artificial the charge with reagent, be in probably thousands of to on 10 thousand yuan of RMBs. Study as a result of what repeat a test the group is numerous, fold the research funds that adds up place is cost to be absent a few, because cannot repeat the energy that the experiment wastes and time cost,this still does not calculate.

Han Chunyu and Heibei science and technology depend on this controversy paper mostly, a few short the month won a lot of honor and support. On July 7, 2016, university of Heibei science and technology is released fair show, plan to recommend Han Chunyu to be 2016 year " scholar of the Yangtse River rewards a plan " person selected candidate; On July 13, han Chunyu is elected to be saved for Heibei division assist vice-chairman. The appellation that after this netizens speak " Chairman Han " , namely from this and come; On August 18, han Chunyu is obtained judge " beautiful Heibei · is the most beautiful teacher " honorary title; On August 31, heibei province hair changes appoint give an official agrees to invest big gene of division of Heibei of 224 million construction to edit a research center; On September 30, university of Heibei science and technology recommends Han Chunyu as " 10 thousand people plan " " in innovation of young science and technology gets a soldier just " . Fund appoint the website also shows, han Chunyu obtains batch of problems to be " what NgAgo-gDNA gene edits a technology is perfect with applied dug " 1 million scientific fund, begin from January 2017, by a definite date two years.

On August 3, 2017, group of Han rain during springtime recalls this paper.

The view of all sorts of antilogy

Nowadays, school square the statement with him Han Chunyu, just admitted not to repeat experimental result, emphasize doing not have subjective and intended.

Actually, this experiment repeats do not come out to two plant likelihood: The first, group of Han rain during springtime appears in experimental process innocently error, if because get the factor such as experimental environment, medicines and chemical reagents, reagent, instrument,be affected, bring about wrong experimental result; The 2nd, make a holiday intentionally namely.

School square findings is to because,return the first kind of conclusion. "Did not discover group of Han rain during springtime has the subjective case that make a holiday " , both neither admits to make a holiday, did not deny again have make a holiday, just show level to did not discover.

But this road is blocked up early dead by him Han Chunyu actually.

"(experiment) can charge a sex very tall, repetition rate was achieved in my lab 90% . " on June 2, 2016, han Chunyu makes a report in Zhejiang university college of medicine when, full to oneself research confidence.

Han Chunyu is in the allegation of different situation, the lab that can repeat its test has a lot of. Original, he claims to 20 labs repeat the test that gave him, correct oneself saying is to have 67 later.

To October 11, 2016, he is accepting small letter fair number " intellectual " when interviewing, still hold to, he has repeated a test successfully after the paper is published twice. "It is after the paper is published, it is advanced period of time, the time that influences in a week is finished. The time that influences in a week is finished..

Han Chunyu is in whole in the process that is oppugned, for many times firm say " the test has repeated by the requirement before the paper is published, after the paper is published, also had repeated " , do not be willing to publish primitive data again however, from card innocence, "Why do I want from card innocence, are oneself sick? Are oneself sick??

Han Chunyu emphasizes for many times, others cannot repeat a test, the possibility that the cell pollutes is the largest, "80% because the experiment is polluted,be, the operation technology that those who remain is experimenter closes nevertheless " , but do not be willing to go again other lab is directive, think " not quite actual " .

On October 10, 2016, be in " daily of science and technology " in the report that print delivers, the word of quote Han rain during springtime says, "They (the scientist that shows the experiment repeats failure) if be willing,real name comes out, the person real name that we let repeat an experiment to succeed comes out. " actually, before that, real name oppugns Han Chunyu have scientist of a lot of abroad. Dramatic one act is appearing that evening, 13 home scientist phonates jointly, real name oppugns the experiment of group of Han rain during springtime. The following day, han Chunyu accepts this newspaper to interview again change say: Who reappeared again experiment, inconvenience of his of short duration discloses.

Nowadays, investigation and processing result were announced in university of Heibei science and technology hind, on September 1, net of this university official is released " Han Chunyu announces the paper that remove draft to investigate processing to make known his position as a result " write, the technology edits to research a field in the gene of international forward position, put in a lot of unpredictable problems. In experienced doubt, after removing draft and investigation, the guidance that passes expert of person of the same trade of school inside and outside and farther experimental test and verify, realise deeply, process of the blemish of experimental design existence of the paper that remove draft, research is occurring not precise issue, the published scholar of domestic and international person of the same trade to cause misdirect and manpower material resources waste of the paper. After the paper is published, face the doubt of media and person of the same trade, fail sober reason is treated, published a few undeserved opinion on public affairs, brought needless confusion to social community. To this, han Chunyu expressed regret, conveyed acknowledgment to the attention of scholar of person of the same trade and society.

But this one apology too mention lightly, and those self-contradictory places, what is true, what is crammer? School square investigation conclusion was not involved.

Talk with data only

Normal learning examines a program is normally from primitive data proceed with.

In January 2014, japanese female scientist is young Baofangqingzi is in England " natural " the magazine is published have revolutionary dry cell to research a thesis, reputation is consequently big a confusion of voices. Nevertheless, very quickly numerous researcher advances a lot of doubtful point to the paper. Below public opinion pressure, the research organization that small Baofangqingzi is in -- Japanese manage chemistry considers to be in the middle ten days of a month established special committee to investigate paper material namely in Feburary 2014 authentic sex, undertake checking to primitive data of the experiment namely. To April 1, committee publishs a report, maintain small the existence in keeping square research process " concoctive " and " distort " picture behavior.

To the academic investigation of small Baofangqingzi, only 3 months had verdict. What university of Heibei science and technology is as long as 1 year from the investigation that after removing draft, starts is long, nevertheless, afore-mentioned verdict that already announced lack crucial information.

University of Heibei science and technology expresses in afore-mentioned findings, "The data of all and primitive test that checked this paper to involve seriously " . But doubt of square boatman of popular science writer, because lab condition is bad to did not keep primitive test data,Han Chunyu claims again and again in those days, so from which do these primitive test data come?

To making the accusation of the holiday, the directest primitive data that answers means to announce a test namely. Square boatman expresses, in the data that publishs in the paper, picture, it is the data that has arranged, when making a test, experiment this or the data of the record on the instrument, just be primitive data, if data arranges a process in, did treatment to revise to data, see very easily. Publish primitive data and do with the data in the paper quite, can know whether data has been revised, whether to have make a holiday. Likely even and primitive data is done not have, belong to concoctive data.

Han Chunyu from only then come to reject to show primitive data to come from card innocence eventually. And, accepting " intellectual " when interviewing, han Chunyu ever admitted experimental record is not complete, the lab that the reason is him is very poor. According to Han Chunyu's view, his lab condition is very finite, want to use the instrument of communal lab sometimes, just sweep data on computer, some can be swept, some cannot be swept.

Square boatman tells " finance and economics " reporter, the record, main demand that saving experimental data is pair of scientific research, assure basically be experimental authenticity. He thinks, when if the authenticity of an achievement suffers,be being oppugned, cannot produce primitive data, can maintaining experimental result is concoctive. The United States asks to save an experiment primitive data at least 5 years, if suffer,doubt should be saved till the cows come home.

On September 1, " intellectual " hair comment article, put forward to hope: One, the personnel list of the board of inquiry that asks university of Heibei science and technology to announce committee of this school learning to hold water; 2, ask board of inquiry to announce " the data of all and primitive test that this paper involves " , give out reach " did not discover Han Chunyu group has the subjective case that make a holiday " the detailed evidence of this one conclusion; 3, announce precatory of university of Heibei science and technology please " key laboratory of tripartite state " lab name and the personnel list that join check of aggravating second-round exam.

未经允许不得转载:News » Group of Han rain during springtime " blame is subjective make a holiday " derivative more oppugns