Xia Chao records be short of break, what reason is caused?

Never mention it above all Xia Chao, the literal record of business day also is short of break, we basically originate to the understanding of business day archaeology disentombs. Because disentombed,be in those days Yin Dynasty ruins, everybody just determines the presence of business day, identify through inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells of the Shang Dynasty, historians just agree with imperial lineage to be close to " history the Yan Benji that write down · " .

Basis " history the Xia Benji that write down · " reach " bamboo book a way of counting the years " account, xia Dai comes from the reputed founder of the Ix Dynasty the name of the last ruler of the Xia Dynasty, all previous 14 worlds 17 king, in all 400 one's remaining years.

Do not have archaeology to be able to support at present about imperial lineage of Xia Chao, but because oracle inscriptions of Yin Dynasty ruins confirmed " history the Yan Benji that write down · " in the business king pedigree that carries, so the scholar thinks mostly " history the Xia Benji that write down · " in the Xia Daishi of account is fastened also ought to be authentic.

Current, archaeological say without Xia Chao, only Xia Wen turns this one idea.

Current, the view that academia changes about Xia Wen, main component is two, one kind is 2 within culture come 4 period it is dye-in-the-wood summerly culture, the culture involuntary discharge of urine that antedates to the culture involuntary discharge of urine of 2 within culture is put and be later than 2 within culture is put, not be summerly culture; Another kind of main body that is 2 within culture is summerly culture, before answering, the upper limit that Dan Xiawen changes is pushed to first phase of 2 within culture before, 2 within culture the 4th period it is to belong to business to take the place of inchoate " after Xia Wen is changed " .

With summerly government time corresponding Xia Wen changes be existence, the record is some, relics has discovered, but still need archaeologist to unscramble. Apply " new material of underground " measure confirm with photograph of ancient document account, in order to study archaic history culture, go considering next.

If be recorded with simple character merely for, xia Daiji is recorded is god-given really, of course with Qin Shi Huang Fen book concerns this not quite, what did because arrive,that moment remain.

It is sacred and OK to basically be used at augur from inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells of the Shang Dynasty see, it is before business day, the character has not been invented systematically with application. Also can see from the material of inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells of the Shang Dynasty the book at that time keeps data next very finite, inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells of the Shang Dynasty is to stay, but identify hard, and other data may be done not have at all stay.

Wait for civilization like western Egypt, they have stone to build up to now remaining, there is a word above, but our ancestor people be used to without this kind, it is quite easy and addle that like brief wooden tablets or slips for writing, cloth and silk this kind of book keeps data. And the building of the ancients is building construction mostly, also be to fall to rot, cannot save how long.

未经允许不得转载:Question » Xia Chao records be short of break, what reason is caused?