In the mixed divorce case that the author has acted as agent, occupy more, [groovy divorce case] .
This is a definition that him author leaves, case of alleged and groovy divorce, namely:
Both sides agrees to divorce + belongings is broken up without too big dispute (or although open to question, but how is law sentenced very clear) + who does children put in 's charge to bring up consentient (or although open to question, but how is law sentenced very clear)
Nevertheless the author receives a more hapless case recently, some man gets married 6 years, discover child of 4 years old is not him one's own. . .
Reach what how discover then, it is to be in when dot does check-up, discover blood type appears not quite right. . .
Taking the advantage of the woman later carelessly when, oneself are taking the child to was done close child appraisal, discovered this tragedy next.
------------------------
There is a joke before, a certain schoolboy says to the schoolgirl: Still become male good, the child can be surnamed with me.
The schoolgirl says to the schoolboy: Hum, still become female good, my unripe child comes out in my abdomen for certain, the child of your wife, returning may not is yours.
One language is become augury, jest becomes reality very helpless.
The man sues woman divorce with respect to preparation now, solve this problem.
Everybody sees in work of movie and TV, what one party is off the rails, other one party obtains spirit of high specified number to compensate for, let off the rails Fang Jing go out personally door etc, these content, great majority is artistic hyperbole.
According to Chinese law, each indemnity all along very low, hapless thing always is he has bad luck.
Say which big lawyer as to you, can use investigate extremely abnormal blackart, a dozen 5, destroy a day to destroy the ground, change indemnity into millions of a few ten million, that also is the apply colours to a drawing of work of movie and TV.
----------------------
Interpret bit of serious content. Should kiss child appraisal is very simple, do the probability of 99% , it is a real hammer into shape apparently, lai Ye goes back on his word to be not dropped.
If the other side does not agree, how to do? The answer: Different idea explains guilty, acquiesce automatically.
" marriage law judicatory explains 3 "
One party of the 2nd husband and wife sues a request to affirm parentage is nonexistent to people court, already offerred necessary evidence to give proof, other one party does not have contrary card to kiss according to rejecting to do again child of appraisal, OK and illative request affirms people court the view of nonexistent one party establishs parentage.
Party one party sues a request to affirm parentage, offer necessary evidence to give proof, other one party does not have contrary card to kiss according to rejecting to do again child of appraisal, people court is OK and illative the view that requests to affirm parentage one party holds water.
Should finding out this content is not difficult for certain, do not know? To moment the judge can entrust those who make identification to you.
------------------------
If be if, how to solve?
The first, already the alimony of defray, can request to return still. Legal principle can say to because manage,be not had (raise a child for others) , also can say undeserved benefit (it is cheap to let the child kiss dad to occupy for nothing) , also can say con sex is brought up, nevertheless need not kink these, final verdict is same, the allowance that you had paid can return you.
As to how much to return? You are to think the without exception of class of take lessons after school that an all diaper that give a child to had been bought, has bought powdered milk, has bought toy, newspaper passes adds up, calculate an interest next?
However, still want a court to decide an amount to you finally. This amount is on the low side for certain.
Always of our country law is principle of fill and level up, give priority to in order to comfort, carry a hapless business impossibly basically, hit a lawsuit to come to those who become rich get rich (do not discuss a profession to hit dummy) .
The 2nd, want spirit to damage solatium? The man's dignity was done not have, go out to mix later do not have face. . .
This estimation also does not support. You say this is enroach on character dignity counterpoises (let oneself go out to mix the right that has outer part) , be still enroach on does the relative counterpoise? (the right that has child of him one's own) be the edge that touch a point actually, do not pass this stuff, the view can advocate below, support really or do not cherish too big hope.
The 3rd, the other side is put in fault, does property want many minutes when the divorce?
" marriage law "
The 46th has one of following state, those who bring about a divorce, without fault Fang Youquan requests damages:
(one) bigamous;
(2) the person that have a mate and other live together;
(3) executive family is violent;
(4) mistreat, of abandon family member.
The 46th fault compensates for marriage law, what fault can not support.
Although say, conceived the child of others, be a very serious treason, however this is not inside legal compensation.
If you say [the person that have a mate and other live together] , this is long-term, live together fixedly, is not bring about the adultery that be pregnant -- this also is not to maintain those who go up.
How does every law case adjudicate, how play a way, it is the standard covers a region actually, every every court, judge has a roughly fixed measure.
You say, judge so scrupulously abide by rigid legislation, take no account of actual loss, the flexible that make a point of what? The answer: It is so formalist, do to you secure a road.
Above suggests to give authority freely.
