When decorating, need to undertake putting on record to village property first commonly, actually a lot of owner are not willing, but do not have method, the management that village property regards a village as square, you do not put on record, the stock that decorate carries at all do not go in. Put on record of course while, village property is met the cash with a certain quantity of collection, as decorate cash pledge.
Above all, does village property have what authority controls owner to decorate cash pledge? Be in substantially, contract concern is between village property and owner, so village property has authority collection to decorate cash pledge, should see a contract have an agreement, if do not have an agreement, non-privileged of course, have an agreement, of course can collection. But in reality, property serves as strong one party, no matter whether have contract agreement, owner can choose pay commonly, because do not wish to cost, at the same time cash pledge also is met actually returns owner, also do not have what loss, much work is inferior to little be related. Of course, if must truer, owner also can pass lawsuit or complain to the government sector will solve.
Next, since be to decorate cash pledge, so decorating after finishing, property ought to return for a short while, 3 months do not have fact and legal basis completely still with backing down. Property is to procrastinate to will decorate cash pledge take out commonly so property is expended or complement oneself cash flows. Owner can argue strongly completely, ask its take out a basis.
Finally, say a basis more, pay decorates cash pledge, dull makes a person irritated, but it is very necessary that the individual thinks to return, because the village is not two. The quality of each owner also is uneven, all sorts of tearing open of main wall be absent a few, if some owner do not give some of obligation, wish to be able to give the room tore open. If do not have a tie, of fall victim be being returned finally is owner oneself.
