This problem is very significant, also very burn brain, it is OK that we might as well exist really on next worlds suppose first " true " color.
If this hypothesis holds water, the color that apparent mankind sees is not " true " , because the person's eyeball can feel specific spectrum only, resemble us cannot hearing ultrasonic, but the truth that it exists really is same.
Same, the color that sees in dog eye also is mixed of the mankind not quite same, to the mankind the dog is daltonism actually, the color that so the dog can feel also is not necessarily " true " . Continue deduction continues we are not fathomless what 10 thousand kinds of different animals may have 10 thousand kinds to differ is right " true " the perception of color.
Crucial question is, alleged " true " what is color after all? Have a kind of life to feel this thoroughly to plant " true " ?
I consider as those who do not have. What different life can feel is the color of actual to them version only, so called " true " actually and the decision criteria with absolutely neither one, the world that feels achromatopsia to the person of anomalous trichromatism sees like us is not " true " , but the color that actually these people can see possibly we cannot see. Just we use now detect what the standard of achromatopsia anomalous trichromatism uses is " Everyman " the color that can see serves as fiducial, but this kind of standard was not represented is " true " .
If the person of the great majority on the earth is achromatopsia anomalous trichromatism, so instead they were become " Everyman " and " fiducial " , and we are their eye is medium " patient " .
In other words, because do not have absolutely decision criteria, what what we assume at the beginning is alleged " true " color is nonexistent actually. Since do not have absolutely " true " color, what so different person, animal and life can feel is opposite to them " true " the world.
very burn brain? Can think carefully, leave your point of view.
